Sunday, March 20, 2016

15 Laughably Pathetic Photos of Race Mixers

Quoting:

We might not be done with racism just yet. Donna Pinckley highlights this issue by taking photos of interracial couples in the Southern states of the US and pairing them with the hateful comments they’ve received over the years. She takes the photos in black and white to emphasize the affection these couples have for each other instead on focusing on their skin tones. [...]


"What struck me was the resilience of both couples in the face of derision, their refusal to let others define them.”

Huh? This entire project defines these people as mixed-race couples. That definition is what led you to photograph them in the first place! God, why is everyone so stupid? Do they even hear themselves when they speak, or do they randomly string social justice platitudes together and nod approvingly at one another's sentimentality? This is propaganda. It creates an identity out of a fetish and then uses unproved claims of persecution to laud those who have been defined as possessing that identity. And just who are these people? Well, let's look at the breakdown of the couples presented:


Black guy, fat white woman: 5 (Classic stereotype accidentally reinforced).
Black guy, white woman: 3

White guy, black woman:2
White guy, asian woman:2
Black guy, asian woman: 1
White guy, black guy (only homo couple):  1
Beaner guy, white woman: 1

In 9/15 photos, the interracial couple contained a white woman, and in 10/15 photos, the interracial couple contained a black man. This despite the fact that it is actually Asian women and Latino men who are most likely to marry outside of their race - LINK. So why is it that whenever we are treated to depictions of interracial relationships in the media, the focus is overwhelmingly on black men and white women - and usually they are together?

In my opinion the answer to that question is because the point of MultiKulturalism is the geno-suicide of White people. The White woman is the specific target of the effort to normalize race-mixing because she is the bottleneck of reproduction. How many children will she have in her lifetime? The average in most Western countries is below replacement level already. Now add to that if she has just one mixed-race child, you have cut by more than half her production of Chalkies. She must be targeted because she has to invest much more in the creation of offspring than a White man has to, and therefore it is most ruinous to White people if she invests those limited resources in making subhumans. This also explains why in 4/5 of the photos that actually contain children, they are a product of white women with black men. The black man can, and does, go on to father children with black women, while the white woman raises the mudlings he leaves behind.

The white man, by contrast, must be shown to be disloyal and unproductive. The best way to do that is to pair him up in multiple fetishistic situations with next to no sign of fertility - two black women, two Asian women, and one gay black guy, and only in one case is a child present. The White woman is shown that the White man is in no position to criticize her disloyalty, when he is up to race-mixing mischief as well. Still, for the most part he is dead-ending himself, and his lack of virility is on display in stark contrast to the white female race traitors and the black males.

This is not to say the either the authoress of the article or the photographess of the pictorial consciously planned out how they are contributing to White geno-suicide. They are not following some cookbook, documented approach to destroying White people. They are simply highly skilled in unconsciously regurgitating the propaganda in which they were immersed by the Mass Media that indoctrinated them. And it was the MultiKult's Mass Media that crafted the various instruments of White geno-suicide step by step as part of their generational war against White people.

10 comments:

  1. As usual these libtards have no real point to make other than "stop making mean comments"

    Today's sjws are alot more dangerous than the 70s pot smoking hippie faggots

    You couldn't pay me a £1 million to raise a filthy nigglet


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Social media has quickened the Leftist culture-destroying impulse into the insanity we see today.

      Delete
    2. I'd do it for 10 million.

      Delete
    3. Social media, esp. Facebook, is the matrix thought-control system on steroids. With every SJW meme that explodes overnight and sets the parameters of acceptable speech thereafter, we see that people really are mindless sheep.

      Delete
    4. Anon1
      Ha! I doubt you'd get any takers on your offer to raise a niglet for 10 million. Think of how much anti-White celebrities like Madonna *spend* to acquire African photo-ops.

      Anon2
      Yes! Social media breached the fourth wall and made everyone an actor in the reality show that is the Death of the West.

      Delete
  2. Heres an old but great story
    Faggot told by school to dress like a man or go home

    http://www.babble.com/mom/teen-boy-told-to-dress-like-a-man-or-else/

    The story is only 6 years old,it proves how obongos gay agenda has destroyed america

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He look's like Madeline Kahn in "Clue".

      But what is the 'Kwanian definition of "dressing like a man" these days? Cargo shorts, flip flops, a sports Jersey, and a baseball cap - ready for Grandma's funeral.

      Delete
  3. "In my opinion the answer to that question is because the point of MultiKulturalism is the geno-suicide of White people. The White woman is the specific target of the effort to normalize race-mixing because she is the bottleneck of reproduction. How many children will she have in her lifetime? The average in most Western countries is below replacement level already. Now add to that if she has just one mixed-race child, you have cut by more than half her production of Chalkies. She must be targeted because she has to invest much more in the creation of offspring than a White man has to, and therefore it is most ruinous to White people if she invests those limited resources in making subhumans. This also explains why in 4/5 of the photos that actually contain children, they are a product of white women with black men. The black man can, and does, go on to father children with black women, while the white woman raises the mudlings he leaves behind.

    The white man, by contrast, must be shown to be disloyal and unproductive. The best way to do that is to pair him up in multiple fetishistic situations with next to no sign of fertility - two black women, two Asian women, and one gay black guy, and only in one case is a child present. The White woman is shown that the White man is in no position to criticize her disloyalty, when he is up to race-mixing mischief as well. Still, for the most part he is dead-ending himself, and his lack of virility is on display in stark contrast to the white female race traitors and the black males."

    First rate analysis. You really understand the jew. Have you ever read Culture of Critique, BTW?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you liked it. And excellent point linking this form of modern media manipulation back to our people's ancient conflict with the Kikes. As for CoC, I've only read portions. If you have an instinctive jew-wiseness, CoC's cerebral approach drags on quite a bit. Plus, I've gotten to the point I can only keep interest in something if it has a least one racial slur per paragraph.

      Delete
    2. Bravo = I'm so pleased others can see what I've been seeing

      Delete