Monday, December 14, 2015

ISIS OK's Euthanasia of Disabled Muzzie Youth-in-Asia


ISIS have issued a fatwa which orders children with Down's syndrome and other disabilities to be killed in a chilling echo to the workings of the Nazis, it is claimed.

Holy shit, zero to Nazi in under three seconds. Bravo, Daily Mail cuckservatives!

Sharia judges have apparently ruled that ISIS followers are authorised to 'kill newborn babies with Down's Syndrome or congenital deformities and disabled children' in their latest sickening act.

More than 38 children born with deformities and Down's syndrome, aged between one week and three months, have already been killed by lethal injection or suffocation, according to Iraqi activist group Mosul Eye.

38? Uh huh. Calculating from the latest government statistics in the UK, there were over 500 abortions yesterday in the UK. So ISIS has a lot of catching up to do if they want to keep pace with the baby-killing factories of the West. Oh, but I know that these two are nowhere similar in the minds of the majority of Westerners. Killing a child before it has its snatch-passing, that is just fine. Once the kid has been birthed you got to keep 'em - that's the Western way.

However, why should women in Third World countries / war zones, who have limited to no access to the same prenatal medical care women in the West have, be forced to bear and keep their deformed offspring simply because they could not know of their child's condition in utero? Your White Western privilege gives you a choice they don't have. Hell, you can legally kill your unborn baby because you don't want the financial burden of raising it! But the child born in the Third World does not have access to the medical treatments or even the consumer comforts of daily life that you don't want to be burdened paying for. What you are suggesting is that it must live in agony, and its mother must nurture that agony, because your Western-cultural-supremacism forces them to adhere to a moral standard you in the West will never have to be tested to live by.

Do you see where I am going with this? It's a perfect bit of Leftist reasoning. Why should a woman have the right to choose removed simply because she had to bring a child to term in order to learn whether or not it was severely deformed? And who are White Western women to condemn non-White women in the Third World to live by White Western morals, when these White Western women have never had to live under Third World conditions?

Number of


  1. I came over here solely to see whether Adrean grabbed this for the Retard Worship tag.

    As for abortion, most of the ones happening in the white world are, thankfully, tards, and you know who I mean. Members of the IQ-mean-85 group, 50% of which would have been considered retarded prior to the early '70s redefinition of the term one standard deviation downward (to 70). This occurred precisely because there was no hope of providing retardation management services to all of them. Redefining a third of them (actually 34.1%) as normal got rid of a whole host of problems. Just like, say, you can redefine crime away by not counting it.

    1. Informative and funny, well done.

      "retardation management services"

      Holy crap that is hilarious. It also kind of describes public education in general, as the White race steadily devolves from a combination of endlessly lower expectations, and daily exposure to the sub-apes.