Monday, October 12, 2015

Uncle Ben and Jewish Gun Control


A commenter on the Ben Carson Popeyes Scandal story mentioned that Uncle Ben had also recently gotten himself in trouble with the Chosen by saying:

“I think the likelihood of Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if the people had been armed,” Carson said. “I’m telling you there is a reason these dictatorial people take guns first.” [...]


Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson staunchly defended his assertion that the Holocaust could have been “greatly diminished” if Jews had been armed with guns in an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday.

That did not go over well with our Semitic Superiors:

“It is mind-bending to suggest that personal firearms in the hands of the small number of Germany’s Jews (about 214,000 remaining in Germany in 1938) could have stopped the totalitarian onslaught of Nazi Germany when the armies of Poland, France, Belgium and numerous other countries were overwhelmed by the Third Reich,” Jonathan Greenblatt, national director of the Anti-Defamation League National Director, said in an opinion piece for the Huffington Post on Saturday.

Right - so since the Jews could not have defended themselves, gun control was the best thing for them in that situation. Thank you, Jonathan Greenblatt.
 
But honestly, this is just plain political absurdity on both sides. Why in the world does every contentious political issue have to end with an appeal to remember Adolf Hitler and his Nazi gangsters, reductio ad Hitlerum? Can't Americans stick with their own history and fit the 2nd Amendment  into the context of a War for Independence that would not have been possible if the citizenry had been disarmed?

But there is another issue at work here, which is Jewish hypocrisy in the matter of gun control. Even Jews admit that other Jews are obsessed with gun control in America (LINK). But when the country is Israel, well that is a different kettle of gefilte fish:

'Glocker mom,' other Israeli settlers carry guns amid Palestinian violence

Aviva Yisraeli decided to carry a handgun while commuting from her home in the West Bank settlement of Tekoa to a weekly course in Jerusalem. “I feel that it’s important for us to do everything in our power to protect ourselves,” said the mother of four, adding that she refuses to be a "sitting duck." [...]


Israelis do not have a constitutional right to bear arms like Americans, yet guns are ubiquitous here because there are so many soldiers, reservists, police and security guards who take their guns with them when they're off duty and out in public. They are holstered in clear sight on buses and in coffee shops.

When it is the Chosen defending their homes from Palestinian rock throwers - glock away. If you Chalky goyim want to defend your home from crackhead gangbangers - that would be racist.

Would someone mind starting a new social media campaign? #GunFreeIsrael. I would be much obliged. 

2 comments:

  1. even if the kikes had guns they were no match for Adolf and co
    The nazis were physically fit and trained to kill, the kikes were either incredibly fat or thin, not athletic, when was the last time you saw a kike on a building site or working in a factory? manual labour is for the dirty goyim

    ReplyDelete
  2. "the totalitarian onslaught of Nazi Germany when the armies of Poland, France, Belgium and numerous other countries were overwhelmed by the Third Reich,”

    That's the France and Belgium that rolled over and the Poland that got France to force England to supply a guarantee of war.

    The Sons of Morgenthau (and Tuchman) just never give up.

    ReplyDelete