Sunday, August 23, 2015

Bad Jewess! Queen Amidala Questions Holocaust Supremacy

Now, if anyone else had done this, he or she might be facing arrest in the European Union, but Natalie Portman gets a pass because she is a celebrity kike-ess

Holocaust survivor advocates harshly criticized Natalie Portman on Sunday, after the Israeli-born actress/director stated that the Holocaust is no more tragic than other genocides and questioned its prominence in Jewish education.

“I think a really big question the Jewish community needs to ask itself, is how much at the forefront we put Holocaust education. Which is, of course, an important question to remember and to respect, but not over other things,” she was quoted as saying.

She recalled learning about the Rwandan Genocide during a visit to a museum and being shocked that while the Holocaust figured prominently into her education, a contemporary genocide did not.

According to the United Nations, 800,000 people, “perhaps as many as three quarters of the Tutsi [tribal] population” were killed during the course of the early nineties genocide.

"I was shocked that that [it] was going on while I was in school. We were learning only about the Holocaust and it was never mentioned and it was happening while I was in school. That is exactly the type of problem with the way it’s taught.

Ouch, my Shoah! The Jerusalem Post article proceeds to quote various politically-kosher kikes, who basically tell Portman that she is just a Hollyweird pawn, and she should shut her face. Example, quoting "Dr. Efraim Zuroff, a professional Nazi hunter":

“with all due respect for Ms. Portman's great acting and directing talents, her success in the movie world does not turn her into an expert in history or on genocide"

Why not? So Steven Speilburg is permitted to pontificate on the Holocaust and Portman isn't? Sounds like Efraim Zuroff is just a misogynist, mansplaining why Portman should get behind the hole in the sheet and stay there.

More laughable condemnations come from the comments section of the article:







Natalie, sweetheart, the reason the Holocaust is taught in the first place is so that no one will forget how easy it is to radicalize millions and get them to commit unspeakable acts of inhumanity against their neighbors. Would you rather history keep repeating itself? Did it ever occur to you that the Rwandan Genocide happened because the Holocaust probably isn't taught in Rwandan schools...assuming that they even have schools there? You're a Harvard graduate. You should know how to do research already.

Double-plus good racism there Milwaukee Broad! "Do they even have schools in Rwanda?" - Ha! But, you moronic cunt, Portman's point was that she was being taught about the dangers of genocide using a historic example, while an actual genocide was occurring in the world at that moment. Portman is warning that a ethnocentric bias exists in The West when it comes to teaching the Holocaust, causing actual, in-progress genocides to be ignored. Hehehe - must not feel so good having your own ideology used against you, does it leftist?

Here's another eye-popping comment:







The reality is that it is precisely the Holocaust education Portman received that led to her current viewpoints on global genocides. It is an education that evokes sympathy with all peoples in times of trouble. In order to make an impact you need to have that one example that leaves an indelible impact on your psyche.

Whoa - education to evoke sympathy - leaving an indelible impact on the psyche. Welcome to Brainwashing 101, taught by Professor Wiesel. You just admitted that the purpose of Holocaust education is emotional manipulation! It doesn't get more revealing than that, folks. So Portman could not feel sympathy for the Rwandan genocide, had it not been for the fact that you had manipulated her psyche in the first place. That leaves the educator as the only source for determining what is right and what is wrong, not human reason, nor common decency - How Kike is that!?!

And another:



What's unique about the holocaust compared to other genocides, is that people were murdered because of who they WERE, not WHERE they were, they were murdered not because of a regional conflict but because of ideological hatred.

CRETIN! You capitalized the wrong words AND your point makes no sense. The Tutsi are a WHO and not a WHERE. They were killed precisely because of WHO they were. Try to keep up. Just because it is called the Rwandan Genocide doesn't mean all Rwandans were genocided.

And in response to Justsomeone...





I disagree completely. It's unique because of the application of industrial methods to extermination.

What? So, if the Tutsi had first been put on trains, then it would be worth teaching. And if, for example, someone used robotic factory workers with laser beams mounted to their foreheads to vaporize only Azerbaijanis, that would trump the Jewish Holocaust because the method of the extermination would be more technically inspired, right?

Goddamn, that's dumb! From whence comes this idea that Jews are so freakin' brilliant and monolithic in their power? Please let today's comments regarding Portman's anti-Holocaust-Supremacy provide evidence that both claims are greatly exaggerated.

4 comments:

  1. This lolocaust has gone on too long, what happens when the last of the "survivors" are gone, will they invent new forms of antisemitism? The stuff about lampshades and soap bars were proven to be bullshit. give it up kikes ,the new victim is the dindu nigger, hypocritical kikes? i dont believe it

    ReplyDelete
  2. As discussed at murderbymedia2, the jews plan to milk their Holocost scheme indefinitely using the concept that the trauma can be passed on in the genes:

    https://murderbymedia2.wordpress.com/2015/08/23/the-jews-have-discovered-a-way-to-milk-their-holocaust-lie-indefinitely/

    The only problem is, at the rate White people are disappearing, the Jewish vampires will have no one left to feed off of. Alone, in the dark as it were, the brown unwashed masses will turn on their Jew handlers and rend them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, they forgot the superscript TM after "professional Nazi hunter."

    Or is that the one thing they haven't turned into intellectual property in order to charge rent?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I hear they are planning to franchise the brand and dig up dead Nazis to put on trial. They'll prop the corpse up in the witness stand and parade lampshades in front of it. They'll bring in Israeli psychics to channel the Nazi's testimony and reveal how many electric frying pan floors he installed to sizzle up the Chosen.

      Delete