Monday, June 29, 2015

Paki Taxi Driver Insults Negro Security

I think you will enjoy this video from Ottawa. When asked to move his taxi to make way for an approaching ambulance, an angry Paki taxi driver tells a faggot Negro security guard to "Go fuck yourself, you fucking nigger."


Once all the Whities are gone, Brown and Black people of the world will be living in such harmony, right? Uh ... no. It is so satisfying to remember that racism will conquer all.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Murikwa 2015: The Rainbow House from Hell

Do you ever stop to think just how absurd this is ...


... Murikwa, 2015. How can this be real? If you had read a novel in 1995 that depicted a black president with the Muslim name Barack Obama lighting the White House in the colors of the gay pride flag on the day the Supreme Court ruled in favor of gay marriage - you would think it risible. If the same novel predicted that within the weeks prior, Olympian Bruce Jenner had come out as a transgender woman, and a church shooting would prompt the Sikh governor-ess of South Carolina to call for the removal of the Confederate battle flag from statehouse grounds, you would think you were reading the ravings of a madman. But, if I told you all this would be made possible by half the White population betraying their race, and the other half of the White population not wanting to object for fear of being labelled racist/sexist/homophobic, you would think it the most logical thing you have ever heard.

It's one thing to be destroyed or subjugated by an outside enemy. But to have your own people destroy themselves or stand around watching apathetically, what fresh Hell is this? And there it is - back to my concept that you and I are in Hell together. I'm sorry I ever supported the causes of the political right. It's not because the right has lost every battle its fought within my lifetime. It's not because everything I have ever believed in has been systematically destroyed over the course of said lifetime. It is because, apparently, I must have done something so vile and horrific in my past life that my afterlife is to be consigned to this Hell where the beliefs of the right, beliefs that triumphed for thousands of years of human history and brought Western Civilization near total mastery of the world, have been completely undone before my eyes. If I had held no strong beliefs, undoubtedly I would have been sent to a different Hell where the punishment had nothing to do with the death of the West.

I know, I know - THE JOOZ!!! No, I refuse to put this on the Jews. If your spouse is a drunk, don't blame the bartender. If you think the only way to save the drunks is to kill all bartenders, you are insane. I have a visceral hatred of kikes whenever I look into their beady-eyed, rat faces. I have a visceral hatred of niggers when their foul stench hits me from a block away. That is my natural, healthy immune system working to keep me a safe distance from kikery and niggery. But there is something wrong with White people, something inherently, unalterably wrong, that these natural defenses, active in White people for thousands of years, have been shut off. The don't just tolerate these untermenschen, they love them like a lush loves his liquor. You just have to look at the weeping Whities gathered in Charleston to figure that out.

It's not just the enemy Whites who are defective. Even those who still ostensibly have enough of an immune response to defend Western Civilization, our White Whateverist leaders, took time from their daily beg-a-thons and calls to abandon our homes, to condemn a young White man who had enough of being pushed around, then snapped, and pushed back. Oh, they were overflowing with compassion for his innocent nigger victims, but they had none for him. Even if he is nothing but a hologram sent by the great reptiloid Queen of Zion to destroy the stars and bars, you would think they could at least understand why a young White person might snap in this modern age, and feel guilt that their movements were so ineffective that this boy felt he had to take matters into his own hands. Hell, what we should be unable to understand is why it doesn't happen a dozen times a day!

But no, our leaders needed to get in front of the story and make their condemnations heard. Only, no one in the Jooz media heard them, did they? The media merely continued linking the shooter to White supremacy and casually ignored the keyboard warriors who raised the white flag and begged not to lose their webpages and their fanboys. Do you want to blame this shameful behavior on the Jooz? The Jooz made our White leaders rush to be the first to surrender? Again, you would think that such behavior would be derided as impossibly far-fetched, but when you consider it is coming from modern White people, it becomes all too easy to comprehend.

It's just another day in Hell, gentle readers, where we toil beneath the shadow of the Big Rainbow plantation house. 

Friday, June 26, 2015

Military Service is such a Drag

Thanks to a friend sending me this link, my barf bucket overflowith ...

Granted an exception to wear a man’s uniform, Senior Airman Logan Ireland and his fiancé — another trans service member — were President Obama’s guests on Tuesday. Military policy, however, continues to ban out trans service.



They look like a Margaret Cho drag queen and an acne-scarred Jim Carey stunt double. I had to find another article to explain the bits and pieces of what we are looking at, and this one included a vid ... e ... barrrrrffffffff ... o. You'll have to head over there if you want to toss your lunch.


Logan Ireland, who recently completed a deployment serving as male, the gender he knows himself to be. Remarkably, after telling his leaders and some peers that his sex was assigned female at birth, he received their support—despite military policy that prevents transgender people from serving openly. Meanwhile, his fiancée, Laila Villanueva, who was assigned male at birth, has a similar scenario, but works without the support of her command.

 
Logan Ireland reveals her secret for becoming her true male self.


Laila Villanueva identifies the root of all his troubles.

Assigned male? Assigned female? Assigned? Like extra credit homework? What a strange way to communicate one's gender. Assigned at birth. Assigned by whom? Who could have made such an egregious mistake that it is up to the Mulatto Messiah and his prancing war chiefs to set it right?

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Harold Covington Channels Dr. Suess

In response to the Charleston Shooting, Harold Covington shared some advice for those who may be tempted to set the Roof on fire, so to speak. Quoting:

From Baltimore to Hilton Head
Don't go round shooting niggers dead
In country lanes or in the town
You must not shoot those niggers down
You must not shoot them in a car
You must not shoot from near or far
You must not shoot them on a boat
You must not shoot them in a moat
You must not shoot them in the street
You must not shoot them while they eat
You must not shoot them in a mall
You must not shoot them down at all
There's better ways of having fun, then going crazy with a gun


Covington went on to suggest that Dylann could have made a life for himself in the Northwest Front, "where he is supposed to be." Let's get Dylann's take on that:

Here I would also like to touch on the idea of a Norhtwest Front. I think this idea is beyond stupid. Why should I for example, give up the beauty and history of my state to go to the Norhthwest? To me the whole idea just parralells the concept of White people running to the suburbs. The whole idea is pathetic and just another way to run from the problem without facing it.

No green eggs and ham for Roof, it would seem.

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

How many black friends do you have?

One of the details of Dylann Roof's story that causes consternation among the conspiracy theory minded is that Dylann had a close black friend who says Dylann is not racist. I discussed the issue in this blog post. I will not debate the particulars of whether or not this proves the psy-op theory, but I would like to make a larger point about the idea of attempting to divine racism by means of the number of one's black friends.

The question itself is a classic leftist catch-22. There is, in fact, no correct answer. Just being asked the question is meant to point out you are a racist. It works kind of on the level of asking "Have you stopped beating your wife?".

Saying no is a tacit admission you are a racist, which is rapidly becoming the worst thing one can possibly be (with the exception of child molester ... but stay tuned as this society is rapidly decaying).

If you say "I can't be racist, I have a black friend / black friends!" you appear defensive, and at some point you will be lectured that having black friends doesn't prove you aren't a racist.

 If you say "I'm not answering that loaded question." you appear evasive, which is worse than saying no because it makes for better television.

I decided to broach this topic today because of this story about Kyle Rogers of the Council of Conservative Citizens. Quoting the article:

A white nationalist blogger cited as an inspiration by the Charleston terror gunman denied he was racist and blamed the media for fueling racial tensions. “I am not a racist — racist is a slander term,” said Kyle Rogers, who catalogs black-on-white crime for the Council of Conservative Citizens website.

 “I have never said it is wrong with black people being in this country,” he said. “The problem I have is the way the media tries to antagonize racial tensions between black and whites against each other.”

He claimed CCC had a few black members, but he could not name any black friends and instead identified a couple of black musicians whose work he enjoyed. “I like some black guitarists like Saul Hudson (Slash) of Guns ‘N’ Roses and B.B. King,” Rogers said. “There is another one but I can’t remember his name.”

 UUUUUGGGGGHHHHH. That is painful to read. Not only did Rogers fall into the trap, he then rolled around wildly on the sharp spikes at the bottom of the pit, squealing like a stuck pig. Why don't you tell him how much you enjoyed Benson, or that Phylicia Rashad is attractive for a black woman?

I would now like to suggest a new response to the question, "How many black friends do you have?", courtesy of Dylann Roof.

When asked how many black friends do you have, please reply - "How many black friends did Dylann Roof have?". DATGOY willing, the irony will do its work. But be prepared to explain in your best condescending voice that having black friends doesn't prove one is not a racist, thus turning the tables on your inquisitor. Or you could continue the banter with another follow-up quip such as, "How many White Nationalist friends do you have, Mr. Leftist?"

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Maybe it's Race War, Maybe it's Maybelline

A white woman in Texarkana used social media to claim she was beaten by three "African Americans" while passing through a Walmart parking lot. However, the pics she posted of her injuries are ... let's just say ... doubted. Take a look:
 
 
Quoting:
 
The posts in question were published by a woman who identified herself as Ashley Casey Martin, but as they’ve since been deleted, the precise date or time of the posts is no longer available. Her initial post to Facebook (pictured above) included two photographs of what appeared to be makeup-blackened eyes and similarly fabricated blood around her nose [...]

On 22 June 2015, a Texarkana PD representative explained [...]

I was just informed by my social media manager that he was contacted by a friend of the original poster. We were informed that she is emotionally disturbed and that they are attempting to get her the assistance that she needs. We have removed the post to avoid contributing to her difficult struggle.
What?!? Don't give up now, the comedy is just starting! You wussies. I can't believe you are just going to accept that she is "disturbed" and move on. At least ask why she chose black men in particular. Come on, bait that race!

Oh, well. Personally, I think this is just politically incorrect attention whoring. It's doubtful she is racially aware. She just sees the daily nigger atrocities on the nightly news and decides she wants in on that action sans the actual niggering. However, if she would like to join the White Whateverist community, I would not turn her away. "Watchu talkin' 'bout, A-drey-drey?" Come now, the movement is filled with parade clowns of all sorts. What's one more?

Monday, June 22, 2015

CDN Exclusive: A New Flag for South Carolina

CDN has obtained the design for the new flag which will replace the Confederate Battle Flag at the South Carolina statehouse. Towel-head governoress Nimrod-a "Nikki" Haley today called for the removal of the flag:

“The time has come,” Haley said. “That flag, while an integral part of the past, does not represent the future of our great state.”
The Republican governor, who avoided calls to remove the flag in the first few days following Wednesday’s shooting death of nine black members of the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, said taking the flag down would unite the state.

“We are not going to allow this symbol to divide us any longer,” she said. “The fact that people are choosing to use it a sign of hate is something that we cannot stand. The fact that it causes pain to so many is enough to move it from the capital grounds. It is after all a capitol that belongs to all of us.”

And now, Compulsory Diversity News brings you the new Nimrod-a Haley Battle Flag of South Carolina.



As you can see, it represents white people as an X, adorned with nine pussies, 1 for each victim of the Charleston shooting. The pussies are lovingly hand-crafted as true-to-life models of Nimrod-a Haley's own gaping vajima.  Crushing the white people from all directions are the four forces of Multiculturalism, clockwise from the top: Zionism, Social Marxism, LGBT'ism, and Black Nationalism.

Now South Carolinians, proudly raise this mighty Nimrod-a Haley Battle Flag over the statehouse, and Let Freedom Die!

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Sympathy for the White Devils

I admit I am over-fascinated by the Charleston Shooting story. Four days in a row on one topic? That is unprecedented in CDN history. But, out of consideration of my more sensitive readers, today I shall not speak directly of that dreaded 3-named assassin of darkies, He Who Shall Not Be Named Without A Trigger Warning (HWSNBNWATW). But, at this point, it is not the shooter himself or the particulars of the shooting that I find especially interesting (sorry shooter, sorry 9 dead darkies), it is the White Whateverist reaction to the story that fascinates me. As detailed in yesterday's open letter, the 4 most prominent trends in reaction to the shooting are:

1) Conspiracy: This isn't real, He isn't real, the government did this, its a psy-op.
2) Distancing: This is real, but He isn't a real White Whateverist because what he did is an immoral outrage that hurt our movement.
3) Redirection: Sure it was immoral, but why doesn't the media care about the immoral things that black people do to white people?
4) Understanding: The world is an immoral place and our people are being destroyed, why wouldn't He have snapped in the face of such hopelessness?

It wasn't until just this morning that it occurred to me these 4 reactions synch up well with the DABDA Stages of Grief:

1) Denial: This isn't real.
2) Anger: That bowl-cut retard hurt our movement!
3) Bargaining: Yeah it's bad, but what about the Whities who get hurt?
4) Depression: Everything sucks so bad, he was bound to go nuts.

But where is #5, Acceptance? Quoting the Stages of Grief link above:

In this last stage, individuals embrace mortality or inevitable future, or that of a loved one, or other tragic event. People dying may precede the survivors in this state, which typically comes with a calm, retrospective view for the individual, and a stable condition of emotions.

Unlike what we see in the theory of the Stages of Grief, I don't believe White Whateverists move through these stages sequentially, and they may not move through them at all. I would like to think I am at Stage 5, but probably I am still at Stage 4. I certainly never experienced the first stage. Most likely, we may experience a couple of stages before settling on one, but in this fast paced world of snap judgment and the desire to remain consistent with one's twittering history,  most White Whateverists have probably already settled on one narrative, and will stay there in perpetuity. What concerns me is that those who stay at stage 1 or stage 2 seem the least tolerant of dissenting opinions within our own community. It's a shame. Where else do we have to express our double-plus-bad crimethink of White Whateverism, but within our internet community?

I have two examples. One was from a commenter here last night ...

Another retard that doesn't get that the "JUUZ" are behind this NON EVENT. I like your comedy but good god in heaven...y is it so hard for you fucking people to understand that this is all bullshit nonsense?

I can't speak for other "fucking people" in this regard, but it is hard for me to understand "this is all bullshit" because I am not a conspiracist. This is not to condemn those who engage in conspiracy theory, but to admit my own limitations. I have trouble enough understanding the irrationality of human beings that I cannot justify adding a third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and so on layer of complexity to their motivations or the reality (or matrix if you prefer) that we share. Further, when I make a claim to understand the nature of human beings, I feel a need to back up my claims with proof. Simply declaring someone a retard because they cannot see what is self-evident to you was best covered by the fable of the Emperor's New Clothes. I encounter this every day from the anti-White MultiCult zombies who declare people who hold my views "ignorant" for not believing in the equality of races, which is to them self-evident.

Another example was from a post last night on Alternative Right. Colin Liddell has decided to join the Stage 1 community after seeing a video of a black friend of He Who Shall Not Be Named Without A Trigger Warning . Said black friend declared HWSNBNWATW was not a racist because HWSNBNWATW had him (a black person) as a friend. I found this to be deliciously ironic (Thank you Dark and Terrible God of ironY {DATGOY}!) because what White American accused of something racist doesn't counter with, "I can't be racist, I have a black friend!"? I mean, its actually a tv trope for Jebus's sake! I found it freaking hilarious and I said so in the comments field. See the pic below .



Notice that the moderator himself chose to ignore the humor and launch into a philosophic treatise on ... well something ... I was too busy giggling about his repeated references to the words " evil essence". It put me in mind of this clip from Dr. Strangelove, which I linked in my response (as can be seen at the bottom of the pic above):



And his response to the clip? He deleted it. HA! Touched a nerve there I guess. I took the pic because I wanted to post today about humorlessness in White Whateverism, but deleting the video was just too hilarious a response not to change my topic to the ways in which we White Whateverists continue to react to the Charleston Shooting story, and to each other's differences of opinion on the matter.

Certainly, I hope that as many White Whateverists as possible will move into the Stage 5 camp - but I won't condemn you or censor you on the topic just because you disagree with me. Together, let's make Compulsory Diversity News a free speech zone for White Whateverists (and White Whateverists only). Comments will continue to be moderated to filter out leftist cunts screaming "Fuck you, racist!" several times per post, but otherwise, I hope every gentle reader will continue to feel free to stop by and chat with A-drey-drey, and receive the gifts of his evil essence.

Saturday, June 20, 2015

An Open Letter to Dylann Roof from Adrean Arlott

 

Just in time for my post today, the Dylann Roof website and manifesto was apparently located online by some communist loons. The Last Rhodesian.

We also have a statement from Dylann Roof's family. Its of the nebulous hearts and prayers going out variety.

And I do hope you enjoy my presentation, An Open Letter to Dylann Roof.

video

Friday, June 19, 2015

CDN Details Dylann Roof Mind Control Black-Op

This just in from the Compulsory Diversity News Ministry of Truth ...

Dylann Roof's Illuminati handlers are patting themselves on their scaly, reptilian backs for the single most effective psy-op in American History. Startled by the success of White separatism in creating all White living spaces in cyberspace comment sections, the kill order was transmitted Wednesday morning, activating Roof-bot and terminating the 21-year-old Raise-the-Roof project. It should be noted that Roof-bot's codename was the anagram RF-Loony Dan, which reveals the method by which his mind control was activated - radio frequencies transmitted from the concealed bunker beneath nearby Fort Daniel, in Northwest Georgia.

There is no record of Dylann Roof prior to 1999, when it became legal for the Federal Occupied Government (F.O.G.) to implant the receivers that could both track, influence, and retransmit from the skulls of satanist-pedophile victims (otherwise known as programmees, sleeper agents). Inserting the word "Storm" as his middle name was meant to signal other black-ops officers to stay clear of claimed assets, as any organization, website, or person connected to White Nationalism with "Storm" as part of their name is part of the secret network of controlled opposition, agents provocateur, and future patsies.

The Grand Masonic Lodge of the Knight's Templar, Esquire - 7th degree fascist narcissists and child molesters, Inc., the same who put up the Georgia Guidestones then removed them briefly for a rewrite of failed prophetic presupposition on 2011 the 10 year anniversary of the 9/11 hologram attacks, quoted to be the very same who supplied the THREE different handguns used in the shooting at Emmanuel Methodist. (Like the so-called White terrorist supremacist flags on Roof's black jacket which are a classic sign of Bohemian Grove occultist photo-shopping).

So brazen is there assumption of complicity that just like 9/11 they use The Simpsons to communicate their plans ahead of time, this time in the person of Ralph Wiggum (use the number 23 to back-calculate the numerology of Ralph Wiggum and you get Fyro Noland another anagram of Dylann Roof and a code-name for King John Lack-Land, another Mason puppet whose Luciferan baptismal name was Fyro and who is a 23-rd generation ancestor of Dylann Roof, with No-land, sans terra, meaning there will never be a distinct homeland for White people ever again.) The connection with Ralph Wiggum is first established with the so-called autistic bowl-cut haircut of the serial killer psychopath Manchurian candidate, and Ralph being portrayed with his father's gun, while who else flanks Dylann Roof but a police officer?

Notice Roof's tongue sticking out - symbol of Reptilian control, and most likely shape-shifting ability being suppressed by "biting his tongue" not to reveal his handlers so they don't Oswald-him with a Jack Ruby second-tier assassination. In another episode of The Simpsons, Ralph is seen spreading a black substance (black death, African genocide population control) on a roof - more Illuminati symbology of the future "terroristic" attack by Roof.


Even Dylann's programming for White "racism" is matched in Ralph Wiggum who strangely links himself to White Supremacy out of the blue when he declares himself a dream-warrior Viking.


Final connection, so we can see what is coming from the planet-killing globalist lizard elites - Operation Jade Helm, but notice Wiggum/Roof is not there. He is in prison July 2015 when it goes down. Milhouse (Israel) leads, America (Bart) follows, the red communist wagon takes non-greens to the Walmart detention centers. You've been warned.


Thursday, June 18, 2015

Dylann Roof is on Fire

I made this video in memory of Dylann Roof's victims in the Emmanuel African Methodist Church shooting in Charleston, South Carolina.

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Dumpy Mudshark Fired for Calling Her Student a Gay Retard

Oh, for fun ...

Duval County teacher Kelly Hendrix grilled middle schoolers about their sexuality, threatening to get them in trouble if they told on her, authorities said.

Four students at Southside Middle School in Jacksonville told investigators Hendrix ridiculed some of the kids. She called one a “dumb ass,” “gay” and “retarded,” a student said.


You know, she's got a trailer-home-Sally-Struthers quality. Personally, I can believe the allegations. She's obviously a debased person, since she is shacking-up with a Negro. That's really all I need to prove to me that her morals are of the lowest sort. Of course, she claims she did nothing wrong.

“I called the boy outside and I said to the boy, I said, 'What's going on?' And he said, 'Kids are calling me gay,' and I looked at him and said, 'Well are you gay?' And he said, 'No,' and I said, 'Well why does that bother you?'" Hendrix told WFOX-TV.

Huh? That makes absolutely no sense. You remove the bullied child from class and question his behavior, but not the bully? Wouldn't it make more sense to remove the bully from class for causing the disruption in the first place? Let's say that when she removed the child from class and asked what was going on, the child said "Kids are calling me a nigger." Would she have said, "Well are you a nigger?". Would that have been appropriate? Of course not. Do you see how a little substitution goes a long way in revealing faulty reasoning? If only such elementary logic was still taught in the public school system, none of this might have happened.

Monday, June 15, 2015

Strategy and Tactics in White Whateverism

 In the comment section of yesterday's post about Craig Cobb, a commenter posted:

I got on the site today surprised to see you hadn't written something about the NAACP chapter president who faked being black for years. Apparently this is sparking a "trans-black" movement.

I'm sorry to have disappointed. It's not that Rachel Dolezal's story is not both interesting and hilarious, nor is it that I hadn't heard it. However, discussing it does not make tactical sense to me. I can hear it now, "A-drey-drey has tactics!?!". I know it's a shock, but yes, I do. I try to look out for the White Whateverist struggle, and do what I think will help it. In this case, I don't think White Whateverists should touch this story with a 14, or even 88 foot pole.



You see, I hate snakes. When a snake starts to eat its tail, I stand back and let it. This is because if it becomes aware of you before it has reached the point of no return, it may let go of its tail and bite you instead. Let the leftists eat their tails. White Whateverists should let them have this one all to themselves and choke on it. Nothing we can say will make this worse for them than it already is, and inserting ourselves into the story will only give them a way to divert attention from their own crisis.


You may also have noticed I haven't devoted a post to the McKinney pool party incident either. This is because the police officer involved is going to have a hard enough time already without White Whateverists trying to hitch their wagons to him. So burdened, and desperate to save himself, he may make some outrageous condemnation of the White Whateverists who support him, just to kiss up to his persecutors and get in their good graces. Then where we would be? Leave this one alone too. It is a struggle between the leftists and the establishment conservatives. Inserting ourselves into the debate will give ammunition to the the leftists as they smear the right-wing as being in bed with wicked White raaaacists. Think about it. If we sit down on their side of the table, the conservatives will scoot their chairs further down to the left, just to get away from us. Leave them alone at the table with the leftist, and they will naturally move farther away to the right to get away from their leftist enemies.


Sometimes I think that the reason establishment White Whateverism exists is to serve as a leftist weapon. I define establishment White Whateverism as the most popular names in the struggle, who inexplicably pay their server bills without need of gainful employment. Need some guilt by association to smear an opponent's position? Just call up Mr. White Whateverist to endorse said opponent. Need a boogeyman to draw attention away from the latest Muslim rape gangs atrocity? Just call up Mr. White Whateverist to start injecting himself into the story and suddenly it becomes racist not to support Muslim rape gangs. Need to prove that anti-semitism is increasing? Just call up Mr. White Whateverist and ask him to start an internet harassment campaign on a high profile Jewish target.


Sometimes, I wish more White Whateverists would listen to me and take my advice. It is not a wish I often entertain, because it is such an impossibility. Therefore, why even waste time on the notion? It just seems that this struggle lacks a coherent strategy, and that its tactics seem to deliberately favor opposition victory.

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Town with Population of 1 is 14% Black

Can you guess the only resident of such a town? Quoting, with sadness...

A group of white supremacists is once again eyeing a small North Dakota town as the potential location for a community of their own.

In an email sent to the Herald, Craig Cobb, who attempted to turn Leith, N.D., into an all-white enclave, included a number of links regarding plans for the small town of Antler, N.D., located in Bottineau County two miles from the Canadian border. [...]

Cobb says he hopes to crowdsource the project, raising about $70,000 to purchase property in the first of likely multiple campaigns.

Is Craig Cobb ever going to get the message that the media is not his friend, and that there is such a thing as bad publicity? After being internationally declared a 14% black "White Supremacist" on the Trisha Goddard Show in 2013, and then being imprisoned for strutting around Leith with a rifle shortly after, you would think this message would start sinking in - but no.


This can only end badly. Anyone who sinks any money into this scheme will lose said money. Anyone who sinks any time into it will reap nothing but disappointment. At best it will fizzle out, and at worst it will end with people going to prison as before. The only winners are the anti-racists, who will once again point and laugh at White Whateverist failures. Why do I think this? The better question is how can one not think this?

Please, Craig Cobb, I am begging you - please stop doing this. You are not the chosen one. You will not lead your people from captivity. It's not because you are racially impure. I know you've had another test that refuted the 14%, but your declaration you are White was already sufficient. No, the reason you are not the one is because your decision making skills result in public humiliation and jail time. No one in their right mind will follow you to a Dairy Queen, let alone to a mythical Little Europe flowing with milk and honey. Just stop it. You're 63-years-old. Let younger White men take the lead and offer them your support (I recommend not offering them advice, well, because ... everything).

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Inka Dinka Devolution

When I was a kid in the 1980's, tattoos were still a rarity reserved for ex-navy-men and the criminal element. Now, as we all know, it is difficult to swing a dead niglet in a Walmart without striking some tattooed freak show. Tattoos don't even seem to have the same job-killing effect they once had, even in the service industry and healthcare. Like most of the changes I have experienced in what was once a great White country, I am repelled and disheartened by the proliferation of tattooing (as well as piercing and body modification). And, in my melancholic imagination, I can only perceive this devolutionary change as a further part of my punishment - the Hell to which I have been confined (see this post for more about the concept that you and I are in Hell together).

Why should I be so repelled and disheartened? Because it is yet another aspect of human behavior I cannot fathom and that further distances me from the herd. I don't even like it when I see people writing on their hands with a pen. Perhaps I respect White skin too much. I find it lovely and don't want to see it defaced. Though I don't like tattoos on darkies either, because it just makes it look like the have some blotchy, uneven pigmentation or a big birthmark. Come to think of it, doesn't it seem even more stupid to get a tattoo on dark skin? It's like writing with dark ink on black construction paper.


In a way, I think that helps prove my point that tattooing is a nonsensical behavior a rational person should not be able to fathom. And yet, because I am the exception and not the rule, I keep trying to understand human behavior as if, because it is the norm, it is more valid than my own behavior. Therefore, I wonder if scarification is more prevalent among dark-skinned tribals because tattoo ink won't show up as well... I also wonder if tattooing gave pale skin people a selective breeding advantage among primitive humans who would be attracted to the vibrancy of colors contrasted with pale skin... I wonder if Tattoo from Fantasy island had a tattoo of himself?

Friday, June 12, 2015

Handicapped Parking in the Third Reich

I thought of this joke today when I was describing to someone the blind nigger handicapped parking story from a week ago:

Of course, I did not share my true feelings about that story, nor did I share this joke. Neither would have been appreciated. But do you, gentle readers, appreciate this joke?

What I find interesting is that this might offend both anti-racists and the racially aware, but for obviously different reasons. That is a rare accomplishment. You see, there is a strain of White Whateverism that does not tolerate criticism of the Third Reich, or at least do not wish it defamed. However, as much as I may sympathize with the Third Reich and its modern day admirers/imitators, a Holocaust joke is still a joke, not a literal Holocaust, and this remains true whether or not the Holocaust really happened or did not.

As for those who may say that such humor does not aid the White Whateverist cause, I would counter that argument by saying that what we need is more people laughing at the Holocaust, and fewer people debating its particulars.

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Social Media: Helping to Get You Fired Since 2004

Earlier this week, a white teacher was fired after she posted this on her Facebook account regarding the McKinney nigger pool party incident:

CHMh7QcUIAECSri_npsqmr 
 I suppose she was no longer in need of gainful employment, and felt that decades of education and experience really needed squandering.

Meanwhile, in Chicago, a niggeress was fired from her job at the zoo after she posted this while at work:
 




I have no interest debating whether or not these females deserved what they got, or if one was more or less deserving than the other. I just want to point out where we are as a civilization in our hysteria over race.

In both cases, there was no violence involved, no face-to-face confrontation, no call to action, and no evidence of actual discriminatory behavior in relation to their crimethink. So, what I want to know from you taxpayers is - are you really so offended by this that you feel the proper redress is to render these two unemployable burdens of the state?

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

"This is White Trash at its Finest"

It sure is, quoting ...

A mother who was captured on camera beating a fellow Walmart shopper and calling for her six-year-old son to help has said the confrontation began when the other woman made a racist remark towards an employee.


A woman named Amber called the Smiley Morning Show on WZPL and said she was the mother seen in the video, which was recorded in Beech Grove, Indiana at 10pm on Thursday.



Amber told the hosts that she was in the Walmart when she heard the other woman, who was in a motorized scooter, call the worker the n-word.

'She was sitting and yelling at an employee and she was telling her she was a nigger and she was going to get out of her chair and whoop her ass,' Amber said.


Ah, and there it is. What a perfectly reasonable explanation for dragging your six-year-old son into a roll-around-on-the-floor-of-Walmart White Trash beat down. "She called someone a nigger, so I wuz in my rightz to whoop her azz." [Not a literal quote, but an incredible simulation.] I guess since niggers get away with justifying the battering of White people by saying "She called x a nigger!", this skank thought she would just culturally appropriate that aspect of niggerdom for her own purposes.

At 54 seconds in, the filmer says "This is White Trash at its finest". He is absolutely correct. Still, could you ever have imagined in your wildest nightmares that White civilization would degrade so rapidly, so completely, that two White Trash skanks would be wrestling on the floor of Walmart because one called somebody a nigger and the other took offense?


You know, it must be really awkward for them, both having to return home to the same trailer park once this fight was over.

Tuesday, June 09, 2015

Brittany Sonnier: Woman of the Future

This is going to get strange really quick, prepare yourself. Quoting...

A young mother was arrested after confessing to having sex with a minor and supplying him with drugs. Police arrested Brittany Sonnier, 23, of Holly Hill, Florida after the 15-year-old boy, who lived next door, told his parents about the relationship. The boy told them after becoming concerned he may have contracted a venereal disease when he learned Sonnier had been accused of having ‘vaginal and oral sex with two canines’ in 2012.

What did I tell you? First it was the dogs, now she touchin' the chilluns! It's funny, she kind of looks like some Disney villainess who would be up to no good:


Sonnier wants 101 Dalmatians - to have sex with.

Now, the reason I chose this topic is because I believe Brittany Sonnier is approximately 15 to 30 years ahead of her time. That is to say, by 2030 or 2045, I think she would not face criminal charges for sexual antics with either underage boys or consenting canines. If this is true, it means that within her lifetime, her actions will go from criminal to socially acceptable. Further, someone else has already worked out why this transformation will occur. Allow me to quote this article: Is it now OK to have sex with animals?

[...] the liberal philosopher Martha Nussbaum has argued, the "ick factor" just isn't a reliable basis on which to make moral evaluations. And we know that from lived experience. Interracial romances once seemed icky, but then they didn't. Next it was homosexual acts that passed through the looking glass from repellant to respectable. Faced with this slippage and uncertainty — with a long string of reversals in moral judgment — it's no wonder that the ethic of unconditional niceness increasingly trumps all other considerations.

Roughly 2,500 years since Socrates first raised the question of how we should live, several centuries since the Enlightenment encouraged us to seek and promulgate scientific knowledge about the universe and human nature, Western humanity seems to have come to the conclusion that we haven't got a clue about an answer. There is no consensus whatsoever about what ways of life are intrinsically good or bad for human beings.

Get married and have kids? If that's what you want, sounds good. Live in a polyamorous arrangement? As long as everyone consents, have fun. What about my intense desire to copulate with a horse? Just make sure no one gets hurt — with hurt defined in the narrowest of terms (covering physical harm and the violation of personal preferences).

That's all we've got. Or at least all we're left with, now that we've shed the (ostensibly) discredited notions of human virtue that most people once affirmed.

Monday, June 08, 2015

Beaten at 18 Days with an Ugly Stick

Please, look at this advert:


Now, if you're like me, you read this as "Dad's Princess - beat at 18 days." That's because I would not think it necessary to turn hashtags and hearts into words anymore than I would have assumed the word "crown" was meant to be inserted between the two s's in "Princess". In my dying world, people still try to speak in complete sentences. Taking the words at face value, it looks like some nigger beat this moonpie-faced niglet when she was 18 days old. I find this completely plausible.

But no - what this advert is trying to say is "#heartbeat at 18 days", which is a Pro-Life message. And this particular message went up in Atlanta, which apparently has lots of darkies. Furthermore, some of those darkies took offense to this message. Quoting:

Protesters in Atlanta called for the removal of a new ad campaign in their neighborhood last week, which they are calling racist.

The ad in question, sponsored by Minnesota based ProLife Across America, reads “Dad’s Princess,” next to the picture of a black baby girl. Nikema Williams, of Planned Parenthood, told local WXIA that the ads were just an attempt by the pro life organization to shame women and their choices.

Nikema - HA! What a great nigger-name. Just do her.

Well, Nikema, had they truly wished to shame black people in Atlanta, they could have put up billboards of the gaggle of nigger teachers convicted of racketeering in the Atlanta Public Schools cheating trial. Please don't take from this that I support the efforts of these (no doubt White) do-gooders, who are trying to prevent your ilk from aborting their progeny. I just find it funny that people who want to prevent the abortion of black children are considered just as racist as those of us who want blacks to abort their children. Oh, DATGOY (Dark And Terrible God Of ironY).

Sunday, June 07, 2015

A Patch of Zoo

My title today refers to this bit of leftist propaganda: A Patch of Blue

As we all know, race is only skin deep, and since race is nothing but a color thing, if we poke out everyone's eyes, we will end racism once and for all! Anti-racists rejoice, and get your eye pokers ready!


Then again, maybe we should reconsider: Blind People Can Still Identify Race (And Be Racist)

The article I linked directly above makes some pretty tortured arguments that blind people can be taught racial differences and therefore race doesn't really exist because it has to be taught (the same argument for why calculus doesn't exist, right?). However, it does make a candid admission that I found amusing, and that inspired today's post. I hope you will enjoy it:

Just like the average American, blind people are raised with beliefs about race—many of which are divisive. One blind man told [a researcher] that his father taught him to identify black people by smell. (In fact, the idea that black people smelled badly featured in many of the responses in [the researcher's] paper.) 
 
I'm sure the anti-racists have a solution for that too:
 

Saturday, June 06, 2015

Did Jews Do Caitlyn Jenner?


I enjoy the double entendre in that title. But either way you take it, Bruce Jenner got fucked.

Easily Outraged: What's that supposed to mean? Caitlyn has never been happier, and has more media attention and commercial opportunity than she's had in 30 years! You don't know what you're talking about!

No - you don't know what I am talking about. I am talking about Bruce Jenner, not Caitlyn Jenner. You leftist cunts acknowledge that she is no longer Bruce, therefore I am correct in referring to Bruce as a distinct person from the past, a person no longer with us by your own definition. Or are you going to disagree with me that Bruce was a miserable closet-case who hated his life as a man and that his life before Caitlyn was indeed fucked?

Easily Outraged: Errmm...

That's what I thought. Let us proceed with the Easily Outraged on mute.

I chose this topic today because a commenter left a message about Jenner on yesterday's post about Rat-Faced Kikes. (Thank goodness I muted the Easily Outraged before I dropped that one, eh?). The thing is, ever since Caitlyn was trotted out at the Freak Show for a good gawk, a link between Jenner and the kikes has been a hot topic among alternative media. Even the alpha males and their omega haters have weighed in on the topic:

I doubt you would be terribly shocked if I told you that fans of the misogynistic not-quite-Nazi pickup guru Roosh Valizadeh aren’t exactly celebrating Caitlyn Jenner’s appearance on the cover of Vanity Fair.

You might be a little surprised, though — as I was — to discover that some of these lovely fellows are blaming the whole thing on … the Jews. 

"Unsurprisingly, executing that funny business are ruthless agents of Zion. The Vanity Fair cover, with that quasi-ambiguous exposed crotch shown front and center in our faces was photographed by Leibovitz."

But it doesn't stop there among the alternative media. For example, we have Brother "Ex-Jew" Kapner's take:

If Jenner’s castration of his testicles and shoving his penis toward his anus is “heroic” then the Jews have succeeded in changing the traditional meaning of words.

The only thing “bold” about Jenner’s transgender moment is how the Jews have taken a white ‘christian’ Olympic hero, cut off his balls, and implanted a pair of breasts on his once hairy chest.

And this from Veterans Today:

Who Put “Caitlyn Jenner” on a Pedestal? 

[...] the Dreadful Few will do their best to attract Goyim to their subversive movements. Sometimes they would pay the Goyim well, put them in front of national television, and applaud them for the work they are doing. It is almost the same thing when it comes to the entertainment industry. You remember what Lawrence Bender said to Quentin Terantino’s Inglorious Basterds when it first came out? Bender said,

“As a fan, I thank you; as your producer, I thank you; as a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you.”

And what does Compulsory Diversity News have to say? (Please indulge me now even if you didn't ask.)

The Jews are not a monolithic force. There are Jews who stray from leftist orthodoxy and must be corralled back in with their herd. For example, this article actually considers how Moses Maimonides would react to the Jenner sex-change, which I suppose is the Jewish equivalent to invoking Jesus for the same purpose of confounding tradition and moral objectivity.

It is my assertion that the Spirit of Our Age is one of Western Death. Whether by murder, suicide, or cultural poison, we are surrounded by death and decay. This demonic spirit has all sorts of followers, but its most high profile, loyal disciples are always kikes. If something is destroying the West, you will always find a Jew leading, promoting, or at its right hand. So, did Jews Do Caitlyn Jenner? Of course they did. To say otherwise would require a willful act of ignoring their own words...


Friday, June 05, 2015

Rat-Faced Hollywood Kikes

As we all know, Judaism is just a religion, and certainly not the result a thousands of years of inbreeding among demonic, rat-faced kikes. To assert otherwise is to be a kooky conspiracist. And you can't spell conspiracist without R-A-C-I-S-T. Hell, how can anyone even tell who's a Jew? You can't of course. Just look at these random Hollywood celebrities and try to tell me which one is a Jew. It can't be done.