Sunday, July 06, 2014

State of the White Disunion: 2014

It has been twenty years since I dialed up my Compuserve account and began looking for like-minded White people with whom to communicate. And while internet bandwidth has increased, and the quality of nigger jokes has improved, I am not pleased with the State of the White Disunion, 2014. Today, I find the movement dominated by five disparate ideologies that are equally ineffective and disheartening. The first has been around for decades, but is still going strong. The remaining four are more-or-less 21st century inventions. I suggest we delete these from our browsers permanently:

1) White Jebusists
Belief System: The White race can only be saved by having faith that a 2,000 year old Jewish carpenter died in order to absolve you of the sin of a 6,000 year old rib-woman eating a magic apple and tricking her boyfriend-brother into doing the same.
Achilles Heel: Cares more about filling church pews than securing borders.
Consequence: Whiteness ends with baptism of mixed race grandchildren.

2) White Got-Gamers
Belief System: White women are skanks who are easily tricked into spreading their legs for douchebags and non-White scum, and who will only settle for decent men when they can no longer attract men they find sexually appetizing.
Achilles Heel: Will have no children, or will be incapable of raising children with self-esteem (tell your daughter she will become a gullible whore upon menstruation, tell your son you conned his mother into a one-night stand or that his mother is a no-account whore who settled for you when she became too ugly to give away her "poon" to better looking bar crawlers.)
Consequence: Whiteness ends with dissolution of family unit and/or failure to pass on genes.

3) White Intellectualamists
Belief System: Put down Guns & Ammo and pick up Julius Evola.
"I despise White Nationalism. I am an advocate of Radical Third Way Traditionally Reactionary Existentialist Identitarianism!"
Which means what?
"I have to sell 3,000 copies of Savitri Devi's "The Lightning and the Sun" by Thursday or they will repossess my Hyundai Sonata."
Achilles Heel: Has zero relevance to anyone not living in 1924 Weimar Germany.
Consequence: Whiteness ends when Hyundai Sonata is repossessed.

4) White Band of Faggots
Belief System: Never wear a shirt. White men will only regain their sense of manliness and self-respect by frolocking naked with one another while reenacting scenes from Fight Club, 300Vikings, and American History X.
Achilles Heel: Movement otherwise known as softcore gay porn.
Consequence: Whiteness ends with anal warts.

5) White Mantra Cultists
Belief System: Internet spam will save the White race.
Achilles Heel: Drank the Kool-Aid.
Consequence: Whiteness ends with an IP ban.

8 comments:

  1. "2) White Got-Gamers
    Consequence: Whiteness ends with dissolution of family unit and/or failure to pass on genes."

    Not exactly true. While it IS true that this does nothing up front for the White Race,these attitudes are NOT something that keeps a man from spreading his genes,if he should want to.

    It would make sense,from a man's point of view, that you wouldn't want to have children with someone who felt this way about you. It would make sense,from a man's point of view that knowing your father feels this way would hit you in your self-esteem,however it is not true.

    A misogynist, for practical purposes, is someone who hates womanhood as much as women hate it themselves. You see, being a woman is a loathsome state to women, which is why they spend so much time trying to force themselves into the lives and work of men,wearing shoulderpads, poorly emulating the patterns of speech and mannerisms of men,and projecting their own depraved aspirations onto men who carry out their fantasies of agency in their amoral and hedonistic minds.

    A man would reason that calling a woman a stupid,vain,half-hysterical and nonsensical wretch led about by her emotions like a young man is by his dick would produce in her a feeling of being degraded.

    In point of fact,all this does is remind her of what she already knows. This is why women,as a collective, take great offense at everything men do, calling it "sexist". It must be called "sexist" to avoid admitting what it actually is,which is manifestly superior in every way to the habits,lifestyles,and conceptions of women.

    A woman may scold the "sexist",but will turn right around and have sex with them,giving her entire body to him to do with as he may wish. Whereas a many holding it as foundational that women are equal in every way earns nothing but womens' collective disgust because they know his flattery to be false-KNOW IT,I say, in the bottom of their heart that EVERY thing that men do, the entire history of man in this world is a testament to his superior ability in every undertaking that a woman would put her mind and body to,if she had his natural gifts.

    The part I have not mentioned up to this point is that all those pursuits which a woman would engage in were she born a man, are of the most morally bankrupt,twisted,evil, and sadistic a man can imagine. We are talking about child molestation,murder, betrayal of intimate friends in psychologically-sadistic ways. Things which men are shunned or killed for,women believe they would accomplish and would be pleased by accomplishing,if only they had the physical strength and size to intimidate others into compliance with social vampirism and hellish social evils of the most twisted sort human machiavellianism can contrive.

    Mother Nature is not a feminist, and she wisely chose to put a being so banal,sightless, and dysfunctional in a shape which is loathsome and repulsive to it and small enough to be checked by physical force (to restrain action on the woman's part pre-emptively).

    All of these things I speak of are known to women themselves. This secret knowledge is the essence of women's hatred for one another, for while they immediately suspect these things of one another when they are feeling uncharitable,they are not circumspect or honorable enough to admit them of themselves.

    A woman is a man with no honor,no morals, and no virtue;and it is not the admission and acceptance of this fact that is the death knell of the White Race but a failure to recognize it and to organize ourselves accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was the anonymous who commented earlier on this. By way of substantiating the claims I made regarding women, I provide this photographic evidence:

    http://murderbymedia.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/the-feminist-solution.png

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Anonymous, thank you for the response! I found your take extremely interesting.

    A few questions, if you would be willing to offer more on the topic...

    1) "A woman is a man with no honor, no morals, and no virtue;" Does this extend to your mother, your grandmothers, your sisters, your aunts, your daughters, your nieces, your female cousins? Can you say this about them, and if so, can you say it to their faces?

    2) You very effectively addressed the question of the ability to pass on genes, but what about the dissolution of the family unit? As I said, failure to pass on genes was one possibility of ending Whiteness, dissolution of the family is another. I said this because to me, "family values" are White values, and conditions such as the increase in single parent homes are niggerishness replacing Whiteness.

    3) A question often thrown out against White supremacists is, if the White race is supreme, why is it dying? So, if men are superior, why did feminism become so predominant?

    Personally, I found the MurderByMedia link you provided to be Swiftian - as in Jonathon Swift suggesting the Irish eat their young to stave off famine. Not that there isn't a true social critique in both!

    ReplyDelete
  4. "1) "A woman is a man with no honor, no morals, and no virtue;" Does this extend to your mother, your grandmothers, your sisters, your aunts, your daughters, your nieces, your female cousins? Can you say this about them, and if so, can you say it to their faces?"

    Absolutely. And their behavior and actions confirm everything that I have said. If I were to say it to their faces they could get mad and storm off and refuse to speak to me,or shift the goalposts,but what they could not do is refute my points.

    I have no daughters,but what I said holds true for every female in my family. For instance,I once overheard a conversation between my sister and her sister-in-law disapprovingly discussing her then-husband's musical aspirations after their wedding. The sister in law said with a sigh,"Well, you gotta let them have their dreams.",my sister replied with an evil shit-eating grin "I'll crush his dreams.". And she did,not 5 years later.

    "2) You very effectively addressed the question of the ability to pass on genes, but what about the dissolution of the family unit? As I said, failure to pass on genes was one possibility of ending Whiteness, dissolution of the family is another. I said this because to me, "family values" are White values, and conditions such as the increase in single parent homes are niggerishness replacing Whiteness."

    It seems to me that women must be forced to be equitable in a relationship,as they have no conscience. While it is unconscionable to force them into a relationship or force them to stay in one, I believe they should be forced under color of law to be good mothers and wives while they are in a relationship they consented to.

    Re-instate fault divorce,toughen up intimate violence laws and rework them to include the abuse that women are wont to engage in as punishable offenses,they fully deserve to suffer imprisonment or fines should they resort to fraud or psychological victimization of a spouse or their children.
    pt 1

    ReplyDelete
  5. "3) A question often thrown out against White supremacists is, if the White race is supreme, why is it dying? So, if men are superior, why did feminism become so predominant?"

    Simple. Men have consciences,women don't. Women have empathy, but no sympathy. Men have sympathy,but very little empathy.

    In lieu of intuition,men use social customs to tell them when to perform sympathetic acts. The proverbial, "help a little old lady cross the street" is one such example.

    Why doesn't he help her walk down the sidewalk to the crosswalk in the first place? Because it is not customary to do so. He doesn't help not because he doesn't care about her condition,but because he hasn't been cued to help at that particular time.

    Therefore,a man uses reason, as you have, to determine when someone may be distressed or feeling disparaged. You think, "If I heard that said about me, it would make me distressed. I shouldn't say it about women.". However,while reason is a very powerful tool for solving most problems, it is actually antithetical to women. Women hate logic and reason more than anything. They even have a derogatory name for it-"mansplaining".

    There's actually some of this going back and forth.

    Women think that a man with lots of money and power is attractive,therefore, in their minds, they need to have lots of money and power to attract a man. When women do this,nearly all of their energies are directed towards optimizing their sexual attraction to high-status males,thereby garnering more resources for themselves. When men do it, it is generally about trying to guess what women want in order to give it to them.

    The analogy you provided is quite apt,and the answer is the same vis a vis men as it is the white race. Their high degree of sympathy and the false belief that "We",whether we is "men and women", or "the races of man", are "in this together". Men,and whites, suppose that others can feel what we feel or guess what we know. This is false,as has been proven and will be proven time and time again by ordinary experience. But indeed, we are superior, as in addition to the sympathy and sublime qualities of both our sex and our race,we also possess the full faculties of selfishness,vice,and violence of the other sex and the other races. We are better at what they are best at than they are,as well as possessing talents of organization, high degrees of civilization, and powers of reason that they will never attain.

    If white men were to decide to unchain the beast caged inside of us, the rest of the world would fall before us like a house of straw in a hurricane. In fact, you can see and confirm this from their paranoid reaction to any unapologetic assertion of white or male identity.

    pt2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Anonymous,

      Your response was extremely well written, and I find nothing unreasonable in your assertions.

      If from personal experience you have found women to be dishonorable, and you do not hypocritically exempt your own kin, then your assertion is unassailable.

      If your experience is that women have no conscience than it is completely reasonable that you would expect a legal or social contract to be necessary to compel their decent conduct in family life.

      What you said in pt2 most resonated with me. "In lieu of intuition, men use social customs to tell them when to perform sympathetic acts." It is merely my parochial custom that continues to organize the world into gentlemanly and ladylike conduct, and insist upon extending courtesy even to those who behave dishonorably. But there is no evidence that my custom will preserve Whiteness, it simply is symbolic of Whiteness.

      I appreciate you taking the time to respond. If you have a link to other materials you have produced or would like people to be made aware, I would be happy to provide that link to my visitors.

      Thank you, AA

      Delete
  6. Murder By Media does not endorse feminism,and I don't want to give the impression that they do. The owner of that site posted the "International Castration Carnival" (or whatever that pathetic feminist waste of DNA calls it) article to show what kind of sadistic and disgusting people feminists are. I post this for the benefit of your readers who may not immediately know what is going on.

    I also wanted to say that your questions were very fair and reasonable,and I hope I answered them to your satisfaction.

    pt 3 & END

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I greatly enjoy the Murder by Media webpage. I am quite jealous of his humorous content!

      Delete