Friday, January 18, 2008

Three-Fifths of a Marriage

What Mike Huckabee showed voters yesterday may be described as gay bashing by the left or an assertion of family values by the right. To me, he did nothing but prove how incredibly stupid he is, and how the media (and hence their flock of sheeple) have lost the ability simply to reason. If we apply even a tiny amount of reason to his comments we will see that what he said is neither gay bashing nor an assertion of family values – it is nonsense – …it…does…not…make…any…sense… – it is the deluded, ill-conceived rambling of a phony, religious nutball.

"Marriage has ... as long as there's been human history, meant a man and a woman in a relationship for life. Once we change that definition, then where does it go from there?" he asked in an interview with online "Beliefnet" magazine.

"Well, I don't think that's a radical view, to say we're going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal," he added. LINK

Let’s start with this: “Marriage has ... as long as there's been human history, meant a man and a woman… I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean … a man and three women…”

Hey, dumbshit! Do you believe in authenticity of your own bible? Consider:

- Abraham, the first Hebrew, and ancestor of all Israel, had three wives, namely Sarah and her servant Hagar (see Genesis 16 v 3), and Keturah, as well as a number of concubines (Genesis 25 v 6).
- Esau, Abraham's grandson, had three wives - Judith, Bashemath (Genesis 26 v 34) and Mahalath (Genesis 28 v 9)
- Jacob, father of the twelve tribes of Israel had Rachel and Leah, who were sisters, as his wives, see Genesis 29, and their servants Bilhah and Zilpah in Genesis 30. Without these four wives there would be no Israel.
- Gideon, mighty man of God and judge of Israel, who defeated the Midianites, and whose name is now used to distribute Bibles worldwide, had 70 sons, "for he had many wives" - Judges 8 v 30
- In 1 Samuel 1 v 2 Elkanah has two wives, Hannah and Peninah. Hannah gives birth to the prophet Samuel.
- King David, a man after God's own heart, had plenty of wives, namely Michal in 1 Samuel 18 v 27, and Ahinoam, Abigail, Maacah, Haggith, Abital, and Eglah in 2 Samuel 3, and last but not least, Bathsheba in 2 Samuel 11 v 27.
- Solomon had three hundred wives and seven hundred concubines, according to 1 Kings 11 v 3, but we'll not list their names. He wrote the Song of Solomon, a celebrated poem about marital love, to his 141st wife (see Song of Solomon 6 v 8) SOURCE

To be sure, biblical history is replete with examples of marriages between one man and many women. So your pronouncement that marriage has historically been between one man and one woman is farcical. Remember also that we have not even delved into the practice of concubinage!

But perhaps you want something more recent, to show you just what a moronic jackass you are, Huckabee? Let’s address: "Marriage has ... as long as there's been human history, meant a man and a woman…I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean… a man and a child…

How about two children? How about a woman and a child? Up until 2006 in the state of Georgia, anyone who was pregnant could get married, regardless of age and without parental consent. Thus a 37-year-old woman married the 15-year-old who got her pregnant. Also, a 13-year-old and 14-year-old were permitted to marry because of pregnancy. Now, the legal age is 16. In other words, at least in the state of Georgia, the radical change has been to ban child marriages, which were permissible as recently as two years ago! You are wrong again, Huckabee!

And finally, let’ consider: “Once we change that definition, then where does it go from there? I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean…a man and animal.”

You fucking retard! That is exactly what we did when our nation permitted interracial marriages! Man can marry animal. The definition of marriage was already changed within your lifetime. The result being the current mess we find ourselves in.



After all, why shouldn’t faggots marry if you let niggers marry Whites?

Oh, but you’re bigoted! There is no difference between so-called races!
We are all human beings deserving of equal treatment under the law!

I REPEAT: YOU FUCKING RETARD! THAT IS EXACTLY THE ARGUMENT THE FAGGOTS ARE USING TO BREAK DOWN THE BARRIERS OF YOUR MORAL INSTITUTIONS. YOU AND YOUR BRAIN-DEAD BROTHERLY LOVE ILK STARTED THIS.

After all, if marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman, why do we permit marriage between 3/5ths of a man and a woman?

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Let’s Play God!

I’m sick of people denouncing scientific research as “playing god”.

God doesn’t sit in a lab all day conducting embryonic stem cell research.
God doesn’t genetically modify crops.
God doesn’t cryogenically store people’s severed heads with plans of future resurrection.

If you really want to play God, how about doing something that God does everyday?
I’ll get you started:

1) Watch someone take a dump.
2) Let someone you know get drunk and get behind the wheel.
3) Witness a horrifically violent crime, but don’t call the cops.


For the record: Would one of you who has found this website in the past week by googling the search phrase "baby bake 3000" please explain to me why you were looking for said topic?