Wednesday, August 30, 2006

BBC Fat Terror Alert Raised To “Beyond Ludicrous”

The British Fertility Society has produced a list of recommendations for NHS fertility treatment availability in England. The BBC has reported this under the headline: “Call for fertility ban for obese: Very obese women should be denied fertility treatment, experts say.”

From such a title, one may conclude that the experts’ recommendations exclusively focused on the obese, but no! The BBC article expands 1 paragraph from the British Fertility Society Press Release into an 11 paragraph indictment of obesity. Compare the first half of the BBC article to the recommendation from the BFS press release:

Women with a body mass index of [less than] 19 and [greater than] 29 should be referred for advice from a dietician, warned of the potential risks in pregnancy, if appropriate, provided with access to exercise advice and offered psychosocial support. NHS funding of their treatment should be deferred until they demonstrate response to these interventions. Assisted conception may be provided if the BMI is [less than] 36.

"But Wait!" you may say, "the BBC is just worried about the obese because they are at higher risk for disease and complication related to pregnancy according to the BFS."
Ah, but the BBC did not report therisk for very thin women did it (less than BMI 19)? And what about the other 10 recommendations made by the BFS? The most striking of which is this:

No treatment cycle should be started after female’s 40th birthday; no patient place on the waiting list within 6 months of the 40th birthday but treatment funded up until the 40th birthday of the female partner; no age limitation on the use of frozen embryos created during an NHS funded cycle carried out before the female partners’ 40th birthday.

How does the BBC explain and expand on this recommendation? It doesn’t reference that recommendation at all! Instead, it allows a BBC physician consultant to mention it off-handedly:
But Dr Lockwood said there were clinical factors which affected the success of IVF and, as well as weight concerns being over the age of 40 meant that "even very high-tech treatments like IVF are really very unsuccessful".

Now, let’s look at some of the other recommendations made by the British Fertility Society, just to see where their interests lie, and what the BBC failed to elaborate on, or in some cases to even report:

- Women who have had previous pregnancies should not be excluded.
But risk of birth defects and complications increases with multiple pregnancies!

- Paternal age does not matter for access to treatments.
But the risk of birth defects (such as dwarfism) increases with paternal age!

- Smokers should not be denied fertility treatment, but should be informed of the associated risks.
These associated risks of smoking include birth defects, pregnancy complications, and …. INFERTILITY!

- Same sex couples and single women should not be denied fertility treatment.
So, let’s get this straight – It is fine for a baby to have no father, but not a fat mother.

Or to sum up…It is ok for a baby to have a chain-smoking, lesbian mother who already has seven kids, and be made from an unknown 90-year-old’s sperm, but it is not ok for a baby to have a mother who is 5’10” tall who weighs 250 pounds (BMI=36). Now if the baby’s mother is 5’10” tall and weighs 243 pounds…no problem!

It seems we are not only dealing with the BBC’s obsession with promoting fear-of-fat (check my archives for proof) but also recommendations from the British Fertility Society that smack of social engineering.

And, what if it was found that women of African ancestry had higher risk pregnancies? What? They do? They have a much greater risk of complications than white women? Well, why not make race a criterion for denying fertility treatment?

And could we please see the evidence that women who were obese and lost weight (the magic seven pounds!) had normal-risk pregnancies? You don’t have any? In fact you didn’t even bother to cite the studies that prove obese women are at higher risk? Then how can we to critically evaluate either the BBC article or the BFS recommendations it is supposedly based on? Don’t you want us to do that, to reason rather than reflexively respond?

I have said it before and I will say it again: There is socio-economic motive for promoting fat-hatred as the new racism. In simpler terms, making you afraid of being fat drives you into a love-hate relationship with food forcing you to consume/spend and then purge/spend. The common factor is spending!

Monday, August 28, 2006

Sabine Syndrome

By now, you have probably heard the story of the Austrian girl kidnapped at ten years of age and kept in a basement dungeon for the past eight years, who just last week fled her captor. Once he discovered her missing, her abductor killed himself by jumping in front of a moving train.

If she escaped a year ago, when she was still 17, she would now be back in the custody of her parents. But, as it is now, 18-year-old Natascha Kampusch does not want to meet with her parents after their brief encounter soon after her escape.

How strange is that? Well, it gets stranger.

In this article, Natascha Kampusch is reported as saying about her captor’s suicide:
"In my view his death was unnecessary. He was a part of my life and this is why I am, in a way, mourning him […] I feel sympathy for his mother."

You feel sympathy for him? Dear freaking god, there is no limit to human ignorance and folly! Don’t bother to make excuses for the girl, I have already considered them all and dismissed them as preposterous. This only reaffirms my belief, stated last week, that COMPASSION IS A DISEASE.

Do you want proof of this? Here it is: In psychological parlance the girl is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome, in which victims identify with their captors/abusers. In theory, the Syndrome may be a primitive instinctual response meant to ensure survival through subconsciously motivated obeisance to a dominant authority.

But give me a freaking break – there has to be more to it than that!

Firstly, it seems a very womanly way doesn’t it? If there is an evolutionary component, it would most likely have evolved because a woman made pregnant through rape and captivity (obviously common occurrences in times of war and social disruption) would have a greater chance of surviving, as would her misbegotten offspring, if she was a compliant imbecile who could be convinced to love her tormentor. So if anything, we can see the trait as a survival technique of the weak willed, those who lack honour. After all, the women who would maintain their dignity and die alongside their fallen warrior mates would not propagate a generation for their conquerors.

Do you remember the story of the Rape of the Sabine women? They were probably all suffering from Stockholm Syndrome! They accepted their abductors as husbands and through this act of violation, Rome was founded. In a way, by producing offspring with women of such flawed character, the Romans implanted in their seedline the future death of their race. They created offspring biologically programmed to willingly capitulate. Women willing to lie with their violators and violators willing to mix with the defeated led to a culture that would eventually forego its honour for the sake of mere survival, a culture that would value submission, compassion, and mercy - all the ridiculous trappings of Christianity.

I know that white racists worry about their numbers…but numbers ill-gained will only produce ill-results! The quality of offspring should be of paramount importance, both in the male and female aspect. Both genders should be bred for defiance, fierceness, and a lack of compassion. The superior, regardless of gender, should look upon the conquered, be they female or male, as vermin to be exterminated, not as slaves and wives/whores. In this respect, color is no guarantee of such quality! The mass of white people alive today are whimpering cowards, as degenerate as the subhumans they so willing mix with.

In every culture, in every context, the fundamental human error of the victorious is to permit the vanquished to live. Progress of a victorious people to a defeated people:
1) Triumph, Conquest, Colonization
2) Victorious men enslave the enemy males and mate with the enemy women
3) A population of half-breeds and lower caste conquered peoples serves the victors and grows in numbers, while decadence and the easy life sap the will and drive of the conquerors
4) The conquerors permit interbreeding between low caste males and high caste females, and thus the final barrier between the conqueror and the conquered is removed
5) A multicultural, tolerant, cosmopolitan society is inherently tense, weak, selfish, unmotivated, and disharmonious – such a culture disintegrates from external and internal pressures
6) Lather, Rinse, Repeat

The result of this process is the widespread ruin of human stock.

I pose a question to my Germanic readers, of which there are actually a few according to my website traffic monitor:

When your own people reach the point that they permitted a paedophile predator to live undisturbed in their midst for eight years, and when the victim of same predator expresses regret that the paedophile had to die, what does this say about the modern Germanic character? Criminal, victim, and society, in this case, seem to be suffering the same disease: decadence.

Sunday, August 27, 2006

He's His Own Baby Daddy

An untermensch in India had to have a massive growth removed from his abdomen after it finally became so weighty he experienced respiratory distress. Doctors thought it might be a tumor. Doctors were very, very wrong.

He is lucky this didn't happen in America. There would have been protestors advocating the "growth" be hooked up to life support à la Terri Schiavo. They would have thrown it birthday parties and filmed it with a little paper hat on its mishapen head (with its genitals no doubt flopping over the empty sockets where its eyes would have been). Christian missionaries would have converted it and baptized it before a cheering congregation. And you just know there would be some ditzy woman out there who just could not resist marrying it. No matter what the deformity or impairment, there is always some deranged cunt that is willing to sleep with and/or marry anything. President Bush would have seen into its soul and demanded a Congressional Medal of Honor for it. It is a sad, sad, sad world we live in.

By the way, is anyone here a fan of the Venture Bros? If so, you know why I am asking.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Friday, August 25, 2006

CDN Episode 9 – Probably Not Going to Air

No shows aired last night on the Turner Radio Network. This marks the third time in about a month that there have been no Thursday night shows. Starting at around midnight, the Turner Network website began to redirect to an error page. This morning, the Turner Network website is down completely. Mr. Bill White asserts that Mr. Hal Turner has money problems. Who knows?

I have posted the link for CDN Episode 8 on the links section. I am still using Rapidshare at this time. I do not want to use an upload service that requires me to set up an account, even a free account.

Today is the 39th anniversary of the assassination of George Lincoln Rockwell.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Compassion is a Disease

On 19 August 2006, I informed you all of the story of a British man who grabbed his two children and made a suicidal jump from his hotel balcony. The murder-suicide attempt resulted in the injury of the man’s two-year-old daughter, and the death of his six-year-old son; the jumper, John Hogan, was injured, but survived. What was interesting to me about the case was the response of the director of the hospital where the murderer was being treated. The director suggested that when Hogan recovers from his injuries, John Hogan should commit suicide. In my opinion, this was a very refreshing solution to the whole mess.

The Mirror reported yesterday that John Hogan’s wife Natasha: “begged Greek police to stop him [Hogan] killing himself. Natasha, 34, called from the UK to urge them to keep a close watch on her death-wish husband in hospital.” This comes after Natasha Hogan insisted her husband was a “caring man” whose murderous behavior was “completely out of character” according to a BBC article from 21 August 2006.

Let me get out my patented Compulsory Diversity Crystal Ball of Doom (CDCBD) and prognosticate for the benefit of those following this story.
1) The anti-depressants he was taking will be blamed for his suicidal/homicidal behavior and form the crux of his defense. Quacks will hail this as proof anti-depressants do more harm then good, but there will be no change in the distribution of such meds.
2) His family history of early death and suicide will be blamed for his suicidal/homicidal behavior and be used to generate sympathy for him in court and in the media.
3) He will in the next few months recover from his suicidal/homicidal tendencies and find a reason to live, most likely through prayer, certainly through some form of Christian faith.
4) His idiot wife Natasha will inexplicably stand by her man through the whole ordeal, as Andrea Yates husband stood by his child-murdering wife.
5) By some arrangement he will serve a brief sentence in Greece, and then he will be returned to Britain for a stint in a mental hospital.
6) In about 5-7 years from now, he will be back on the street and his escapade will be a story on Dateline or a related news program.
7) There will be no justice (or my preferred outcome, revenge) for the murdered boy, Liam Hogan.

Now I will pack the CDCBD back in its box made of human bones and wait. Who knows, maybe John Hogan will make a bed sheet necklace for himself before anyone can stop him…one can hope.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Regarding the Media...

Mr. Turner’s monologue tonight was simply outstanding. While listening to Mr. Turner, found this comment from The Chairman on the John Mark Karr follies (see 21 August 2006 entry below, John Mark Karr's champagne and prawn dinner during his extradition flight) and felt it should be on the front page. Please, The Chairman, jump onto the Turner Network; yours is a point of view that needs to be heard.

You know, it's bad enough I have to hear it covered on the radio... I cannot imagine how utterly macabre it must appear on television to any of the 9 remaining people in this country with any sense of humanity or self-respect not to indulge the mass media mental illness called 'news'! When I left the media marketing business 7 years ago (stopped watching TV 12 years ago) I walked into my favorite watering hole where my gun-buddy bartends, pointed at the TV and told him: "-Everything- on that tube is a lie.. it's ALL propaganda, I don't care what channel you select, it is ALL a diversion designed to pollute your mind, corrupt your soul, and sap your life! Reality shows are everything -except- reality, and most sports series are rigged to go to seven-game championships to extract every last drop of advertising revenue from the fans." My friend didn't belive me.

This entire media 'saga' is about diversion, distractions.. 'shiney objects' for the masses and perpetuating the media racket. We have too many 'journalists', 'media-arts' majors, and mindless females who get liberal arts 'communications degrees' so they can pose in front of the news cameras as pseudo reporters and 'feel' legitimate ... they all serve as propaganda whores for the Beast, and now I am forced to hear them on the talk-radio news breaks; and on YouTube, BBC Online, and other internet sites. It has become inescapable... Lenin, Stalin, and Mao only dreamed of such absolute mind control!

Huxley and Orwell were lucky, they died before seeing how bad it would -really- get; and Lot had the sense not to look back.

Regardless of what he (Karr) did or did not do, the U.S. Media and press no longer provide -anything- of substance. They are ALL complicit in the most massive propaganda machine in history... don't look at Iraq, don't look at Israel violating Palestine or Lebanon; nor the quickly collapsing financial card-house of your nation. Just watch the 'dog & pony show' of some freak and his coddling by the judeo-media police-state working themselves into a feeding frenzy.

What did I have for dinner? Nothing, I had to vomit...
Have You Lost Your Head?

More than ¾ of my visitors yesterday had been directed to my site as a result of Google searches for the Denice Fox (alternatively found spelled Denise Fox) murder in Glen Cove, New York. Obviously, the scrap of information I offered on the subject is unlikely to make anyone’s visit worthwhile, which made me feel sorry for having wasted people’s time. I must point out, it isn’t my fault! For some reason, Google has bumped my little blog high on the list of relevant matches and I have no idea why. So, I want to give you all what you are looking for. Here are ten links, listed by topic, related to the Denise Fox murder:

- Two Suffolk County murders may be linked to Evan Marshall, in both cases women were found nude, headless and handless.

- Rob Kass, fellow rehab patient of Evan Marshall at Supervised Lifestyles describes Marshall: "If you say the wrong word, you could picture him flipping out and screaming,". There are photos of both Marshall and Fox at that link.

- The Rockaway Bedding store where Evan Marshall apparently worked as a bedding salesman:
1924 Route 5 Carmel NY 10512 (845) 225-9155

- A description of Supervised Lifestyles along with contact information, SL was one of the mental health facilities where Evan Marshall sought treatment.

- As reported in this article, Evan Marshall’s mother reportedly answered the door of her house as police canvassed the neighborhood looking for clues about the blood drenched scene next door and told them: “Call my lawyer.”

- Here may be found an interesting history of the community of Glen Cove.

- This New York Times article touts the inclusivity of the formerly exclusive Glen Cove. I just love this quote in light of current events: ''This is the real world -- yes, it is,'' said Carol A. Caggiano, a sales associate at Daniel Gale MacCrate Real Estate and a former city councilwoman. ''It's what the world is about now, the diversity.''

- Marshall played drums in the school band, was on the football and baseball team, went to Sunday School, and so forth, according to childhood friends. Note that he was voted one of the two most gullible students in his class.

- The article on this webpage reports that in 1997, Marshall graduated from the University of Arizona in Tempe with a bachelor’s degree in history. How’d you like to be his dormmate?

- The third part of this article (about 1/3 the page down) describes decapitation fetishism, which is perhaps what Evan Marshall was acting out, or what was on his video collection, or both?

Now watch, after spending an hour looking for all this crap, today no one will be directed here looking for Glen Cove murder information.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

When Altar Boys Attack

You know, back in the day, altar “servers” were just young kids, and male. Then girls started to act as altar servers, and eventually adults did too, and all hell broke loose. It made no sense: the boys were seen as potential priests, but since girls could not be ordained, what was the point in them serving? And it seems strange for an adult to go around being called an altar boy. But this is neither here nor there. Today’s article relates to another, in my opinion, under-reported atrocity involving foreigners in white Christian countries behaving like the subhumans they are.

According to these articles (1) (2) by the BBC:

Wimal Chamila Ponnamperumage, a 24-year-old Sri Lankan altar boy living in Brescia, Italy, murdered a 23-year-old Italian woman who attended the church where he served.

According to the Sri Lankan baboon, the Italian woman refused to leave the church last Friday when he told her it was time to lock up. Inconceivably, a scuffle broke out and the woman, Elena Lonati, hit her head. So what does the altar boy do when he sees that the woman has injured herself (once again, according to him)?

The Sri Lankan altar boy wrapped Elena Lonati (who was still alive) fully in plastic bags and stuffed her behind an out of use pulpit. The baboon then went home and confessed to his family, then tried to kill himself. By the time a search was done for the missing woman and she was found in the Santa Maria church, she had died. Police are examining the body to determine if she was strangled as well.

Here we have yet another crime that would not have happened but for diversity and tolerance. Bravo, Western Culture. On this site, there is a picture of the murdered young woman.

Monday, August 21, 2006

What did you have for dinner last night? Well, guess what…

So what is the American taxpayer paying for today? To answer that, let’s see what was on the menu for John Mark Karr’s extradition flight according to a article:
“Before takeoff, he sipped champagne. During dinner, Karr had pate, salad with walnut dressing and fried king prawn with steamed rice and broccoli. Karr had a beer before a glass of French chardonnay with the main course.”

My, my, that makes my Hamburger Helper from last night seem more than a little bit pedestrian by comparison. Out of curiosity, what did you have for dinner last night?

Why was Karr given this treatment? Apparently, the immigration and customs authorities were hoping it would loosen Karr up and get him talking. Karr supposedly even clinked glasses with the investigator from the Boulder District Attorney’s office.

Let’s take a magical trip into the fantasy world of the immigration and customs officials escorting John Mark Karr:

Karr [lisping and staring vacantly into space]: Oh deary, I just love champagne. It makes me all….giggly. Oh I do declare, these bubbles have just gone straight to my little head, I do believe I have the vapors…….ooooooo…..I am swooning…..I hope one of you big muscle-y guards will catch my fall! Oh my, what strong arms you have, officer. Sitting here, looking in your soft eyes, drinking my bubbly, I’ve never had a night quite like this. By the way, did you know that I strangled JonBenet with a piece of blue string and a duck call? Quack! Quack!

These are the kind of retarded shenanigans that pass for law enforcement these days. Should it turn out that Karr is just a nutcase who made the whole thing up, please remember this preposterous escapade being wasted on a kiddie porn freak. And should it turn out that Karr actually committed the murder, never forget how the West treats its pseudo-celebrity murderers.

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Who are the People in Your Neighborhood?

In Glen Cove, Long Island, New York, 31-year-old Evan Marshall was found in possession of his next door neighbor’s severed head in the trunk of his car. The victim, Denise Fox, was 57-years-old and a retired school teacher. Her dismembered body was found spread about in garbage cans in the basement of the murderer’s mother’s home. Fox had moved into the neighborhood just a few months ago and is not believed to have known her killer. Evan Marshall is also a suspect in a hit-and-run on Friday.

Police are at a loss for a motive, but I have an idea why the killer did this:
His Jewfro made him do it.

Saturday, August 19, 2006

An Argument for Letting me Legally Torture People to Death

A 32-year-old British man visiting Crete decided to grab his two young children, ages 2 and 6, and jump from his hotel balcony following an argument with his wife. The six-year-old boy was killed and the two-year-old girl injured, but unfortunately the suicidal, murderous father survived. Of course the moron blames being roaringly drunk for his behavior, not the fact that he is a cowardly deviant.

An over-so-thin beam of sunshine into this dark story is provided by the director of the hospital where the child-murdering filth was treated. Said the director Panayotis Spatharakis: "I feel that once he recovers and understands what he has done he should commit suicide."

You cannot believe how overjoyed I am to hear common sense like this expressed somewhere in the world! It is incredibly refreshing. But let us not be to quick to let him commit suicide! That would be too easy, and at this point he wants to do it. Give him a month or so and he will pull an Andrea Yates and find a reason to live through Christian faith or some such nonsense. Instead, may I please be chosen by the government of Greece to torture Mr. Hogan to death once he finds a reason to live again? Oh please, oh please, oh pleeeeeeassssseeee??!!!?!?? I'll be your best friend! Just a little torture of this freak, just this once? And then again, and again to others like him?

No, we have to leave my fantasies and go back to the disgustingly unjust modern Western World. In Greece, the maximum penalty this human garbage faces is life in prison, which apparently means no more than 25-years. That is a national disgrace for both Britain, who spawned that monster, and Greece, who is too pussified to kill him.

With this article, there is a picture of the family.

Friday, August 18, 2006

Some Housekeeping Before Tonight’s Episode of Compulsory Diversity News

Today’s article made me feel like I was dreaming. It was too trippy to be real. A judge in the Phillipines…well, you take a look if you’re interested. I don’t want to ruin the surprise.

Tonight, the “lost” CDN Episode 8 from last Friday airs at 10 p.m. on the Turner Radio Network. I have left it unedited, so early in the second half of the episode you will hear me very briefly discuss last week’s power interruptions, which are now out of date. I decided to focus this week on the Season 1 finale episode for next Friday. It will be all scripted, if I can ever get the script tweeked the way I like it!

I would like to bring your attention to the comments sections of the posts for:
1) 17 August 2006, where you can find an excellent post from The Chairman about the JonBenet case.
2) 13 August 2006, where more can be found of my enjoyable discussion with Mad Stan on the vagaries of post-human evolution.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

What is the hell is going on in the JonBenet Ramsey case?

In Thailand, one John Mark Karr has been arrested for the murder of JonBenet and has confessed on camera not only that he murdered her, but that he loved her and the murder was an accident.

This development has very much a WHA!?! element to it.
Its been nearly ten years since the murder, and now they catch some freak in Thailand for the murder. This is all very shocking, very weird.

Let me be the first to apologize to the Ramsey family if it is indeed true that JonBenet was murdered by John Mark Karr and the Ramsey family is in no way involved. Believe you me, I thought you Ramsey weirdos were guilty as sin and I would have strung you up if I had the authority to. You acted so strangely; Patsy always seemed like she was acting for the cameras, like she was putting on a show, her every word dripped insincerity. Then there was the whole beauty pageant pimping of your daughter. Heck, even if you didn’t kill her, by parading her around dressed like the world’s littlest hooker, you were bound to attract the attention of psychos.

But something about this John Mark Karr story still seems fishy to me. Maybe it’s because the Ramsey family has so long been under suspicion, and old habits die hard. Let me ask you all a few questions and present a few facts that I think are pertinent to the case:

Question 1: Is it just me or does John Mark Karr look very rehearsed in his televised responses?
Question 2: Why would he admit to killing JonBenet but not comment on how he got into the house, how he knew her, or any other detail the media wanted answers too, especially since he is admitting his guilt?
Question 3: John Mark Karr was wanted for skipping out while awaiting trial for a 2001 child pornography arrest and is reported as having a history of sexual assaults. Was there any evidence found by detectives at this time related to the JonBenet case?
Question 4: John Mark Karr did a school paper about the JonBenet murder and even tried to interview a Ramsey relative about the case. One of his college professor’s even recommended Karr write a book about the JonBenet murder. Karr’s brother believes John may have become obsessed with the Jon Benet case. If so, is John Mark Karr just crazy and believes he killed JonBenet but didn’t?
Question 5: What about the foreign faction note believed to be written in the house, and the sum of money it requested being similar to a settlement John Ramsey received? Why would Karr write that note, how did he gain access to the house in the first place, how did he know about the 118,000$, was that a coincidence, is the note in his handwriting, since he is a teacher what about the spelling and grammatical mistakes in the note, were they intentional or a verifiable pattern?
Question 6: What is Karr’s relation, if any, to the Ramsey family?
Question 7 (The Key to the Case): Does the DNA found in JonBenet’s underwear match Karr’s DNA? This would seem to clinch the case if it does.

With that out of the way, let us hope that whether he is guilty of JonBenet’s murder or not, John Mark Karr dies a slow, torturous (state-sanctioned!) death.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Wait! Wait! We Just Need a Few More Months to Doctor the Footage!

NASA can’t find the moon landing recording. Oops! What a silly blunder!

Of course, such a supposed gaff does lend itself perfectly to reinforce conspiracy theories that the moon landing was faked.

Truly the greatest conspiracy is that regardless of how inefficient, incompetent, and corrupt the government and its tendrils become, the public continues to support ever greater expansion of government’s role in citizen’s lives.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

More full people than hungry people in the world...Agribusiness solution? Make food more expensive!

Another BBC hit piece was released just five days after they declared an epidemic increase in infantile obesity. This time it was announced that the number of overweight people in the world has topped the number of starving people in the world: 1 billion overweight versus .8 billion starving. So how does Professor Barry Popkin of the University of North Carolina suggest the problem he reported be fixed? As reported by the BBC, he told the International Association of Agricultural Economists:

[…] food prices could be used to manipulate people's diets and tilt them towards healthier options. "For instance, if we charge money for every calorie of soft drink and fruit drink that was consumed, people would consume less of it […] If we subsidise fruit and vegetable production, people would consume more of it and we would have a healthier diet."

Here we have a man with 11 grants/charters dependent on making obesity an epidemic, telling a group of Agricultural economists who are dependent on elevations of food prices to make greater profits, that if governments would start fixing the prices of foods, higher cost foods would reduce obesity and fill agri-business coffers.

Do you get the message yet? Fighting fat is not about making people healthy, it is about forcing people to live on less food that costs more! It is about the ultimate victory of agribusiness hand-in-hand with government, who offers the corporations subsidies for their farm factories and government tariffs on low priced, high calorie processed food. Anyway you look at it, the obsession with obesity will mean that you will pay more at the grocery store, more at the doctor’s office, more to the government, and the government will pay more to agribusiness to starve you.

And once again, physical activity level is ignored. Is the hysterical fear of becoming a fattie worth handing over more money to the government to raise the price of your food? Isn’t the price of food high enough already?

Remember, even by the government’s standards being overweight, obese, and morbidly obese are all different conditions. In this story, it is the number of overweight people (those with the smallest weight gain) that is increasing, especially in the third world. Since the third world is full of SHORT people who are only now being fed after decades of North Korea like starvation, isn’t it obvious that the number of overweight people would increase based on BMI calculations? (BMI = ( Weight in Kilograms / ( Height in Meters ) x ( Height in Meters ) )

This is such a ridiculous scam. The article should be a story about how malnutrition is ending in countries like China, instead it is a thinly veiled propaganda piece for food tariffs to make agribusiness more obscenely profitable.

Monday, August 14, 2006

Pro-Communist, Anti-Fascist Bertolt Brecht Play Can’t Hold an Audience’s Attention Anymore


Theatergoers Snub Streep and Kline
Fans who got a sneak preview of Meryl Streep
and Kevin Kline's new play were left so unimpressed by the performance, some walked out after just 20 minutes. The Hollywood stars appeared in Bertolt Brecht play Mother Courage And Her Children earlier this week at New York City's Delacorte Theater. But despite many audience-members lining for hours to see the show, some became bored by the production's heavy content. The New York Post reports around 100 members of the 1,892-strong audience left early, with one theatergoer quoted as saying, "Meryl is brilliant, but the play itself is boring, tortuous - it needs judicious cutting. A number of people left after 20 minutes. Many didn't return after intermission and then, three hours in, during a long song by Kevin Kline, they were pouring out." The show's publicist Arlee Kriv insists no cuts will be made to the play: "The show is what it is - a long show." Kline took over the role of The Cook from Christopher Walken, who dropped out last month.

This IMDB story cuts to the heart of the diseased carcass that is the leftist movement in America. For decades liberal institutions pushed their communist, egalitarian agenda on the west mainly through public education and media control. But the dumbing-down of the herd, the knee-jerk sentimentality of the mob, the lack of comprehension of anything not in sound byte form that resulted from the left’s equality-propaganda has produced a breed of human incapable of evening sitting still long enough to receive their brain washing, even when film celebrities are brought into the production. Now the herd follows anything shiny held in front of them. Ah, it is richly satisfying to read stories of this sort.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Kill all Humans!

In response to my article on the hand-walking apelike Kurdish retards of Turkey I received this well thought out response that I feel strongly enough about that I wanted to make it my article of the day. Remember, just coming to my site proves you are the best of the best, smartest of the smartest, so I trust that you will get yourself a beverage and read both his argument and my own. And please, if anyone else wants to contribute, I would be ecstatic to hear from others with a capacity to reason. And as I side, yes I love cartoons - "America's only native artform..." Anyone recognize the quote? If you do, can you finish it?

A Response from “Blow it all up" Mad Stan

If it can be done, it can be undone.

Also, I kind of hate to point this out because I like your style and respect your opinions...You attribute their 'condition' to being a retardation, likely due to INBREEDING.

I agree fully. I also believe in broken genes (multi generational pedophiles for examples, or ebonics speaking inspite of multi billion dollar tax funded public schooling).

However this reallity hurts. means we both understand that inbreeding is BAD. Not only is it morally bad, but its also genetically bad. (btw it likely started out being concidered morally bad BECAUSE survival instinct told us it was GENETICALY bad)

Here goes the ouch part...the reallity of INBREEDING, and 'shallow gene pools', is that...truly homogeneous socieites would eventually degrade into mongloid freak shows.

Need proof...look at africa, or 'hill billies'or mexicans... and more. I hate to be logical sometimes. But it seems to me that race mixing is inevitable to avoid retardation, and other disorders resulting from deteriorating DNA.

Also it seems to me that whether you believe in god or in nature or whatever...that race mixing has ALWAYS been happening, and DOES happen, and likely will continue to happen.

The thing is this...
1) quallity vs quantity
2) its supposed to happen slowly

Furthermore, to hold the idea that not all people are the same, and , all white people are all the ones mind simultaneously as truth, is doublethink.

The saxons are not the same as the nords. The indo's are not the same as the saxons. So on and so forth.Each 'white' race is ACTUALLY different from each other. Which means if we are to be picky about things like race mixing then we should also shun racial mixing between...nords and saxons.

Which leads us inevitably back to square one...shallow gene pools.Pan Aryanism, not that im knocking it mind you, is natures warning to all 'white tribes'..."YOUR GENE POOLS ARE GETTING TOO SHALLOW, combine with each other instead of fighting with each other".

Well in say 50 generations, wont this 'new' hybrid white man, "pan aryan" man, also eventually run into the "shallow gene pool" problem?

At that time though, there wont be any 'white tribes' to assimilate/freshen up the DNA. They will all have already assimilated and made the white tribes into one race.

So pray tell, when the day comes that the 'pan aryan' 'race' reach's the 'shallow gene pool predicament'...where will they turn to then for fresh DNA?

So what we see (if we set jewish inspired religons aside)is that nature/gods solution to shallow gene pools which result in retardation, is "inter tribal breeding", with ones own "relatively similar" neighbors.

This is the phase were are currently in, and possibly nearing the end of.

So what happens when ALL tribes have interbred to the point that they no longer exist and instead are now one single genetic race?

The genes will start deteriorating yet again. Its inevitable. Then we'll see inbreeding and retardation flourishing again.

What then? Inter breeding between nations. Inter planetary breeding?Inter Species breeding? Or a whole planet full of ... people walking on their hands, named...planet Corky.

Maybe SCIENCE will one day solve this problem, without the need to import DNA, we can only hope.

""I’m not just racist, I am anti-human! And I am damn proud of the fact.""

I think hate of the human race is the highest form of racism a person can reach. Hate based on skin color is a mundane waste of such a valuable force of energy.

Hate based on the behavoir of another race is justifiable but still not...the peak.

Hate for the human cant get any higher than that can it? Also hatred of humanity is more honest and pure. "racial hate", implies that one race is good whilst the other is bad, or it makes allowance and excuse for a % of subhuman quallity within a given race.

"Anti-Human Racism", covers EVERYTHING EVERYONE. Thus is why I say...'more honest and pure'. Maybe people like you and possibly me, are on the evolutionary cutting edge of "racism in its final most potent form", hatred of ALL humans.

I think you said somehwere that you enjoy cartoons. Have you seen Batman Beyond? Theres an 'enemy' named 'Mad Stan'. Hes a hulking white guy that is well...a suicide bomber that never seems to die, and always causes destruction.

He says "mans problem is too much information, we are suffering from information overload, the human race is fucked up, we should all die, blow it all up" so on and so forth.

What I have always wondered is whether 'mad' stan is 'mad' as in, mentally unstable, or is 'mad stan', sanely accutely aware of reality and thus is MAD as in angry.

All any of us can do in the end is push forward 110% in which ever direction we see fit. I sincerely hope you will continue to push forward, I enjoy your style very much and would hate to see you quit pushing forward, in your unique way.

Sincerely,"Blow it all up" Mad Stan

My Response

Dear, Mr. Mad Stan:

Your post sent me into psychic orgasms of delight! It was beautifully reasoned and thoughtfully rendered. Please, never be hesitant to disagree with me, I only ask that if anyone does disagree they put even just half the effort into their response that you did. Perhaps you know what it is like to be surrounded by people who feel the topics we are discussing are taboo, horrifying, and/or wrong. They shut their minds down as soon as they start considering race, breeding, moral relativity, and anything but simpering adoration of defectives. I do not know your full views on these topics, but being able to intellectually express and defend one’s views is incredibly rare these days, so please (I beg of you!) keep up the good work!

There is much in your post that I agree with, but we might have started out with a misunderstanding. I am not one who believes that the white race is the end of evolution, I simply admire the achievements and aesthetics of white people, and being one, I wish to see my own kind succeed. Natural selection for the better human will only take the species so far. Breeding the better human (eugenics) can take us further, but ultimately designing our species is the future of evolution. The question of what base material we use (which human stock) and what our design aesthetic will be is up to those of us brave enough to envision the Brave New World!

To quote every B-Movie robot of the past 60 years: KILL ALL HUMANS. I despise modern human beings with a revulsion that borders on what I believe our city-building human ancestors must have felt toward their troglodyte, cave dwelling contemporaries. Those alive today who fear science, put moral restrictions on research, who benefit from applied science but are avid technoclasts, are the cave men who refused to move to the cities. I am of course over-simplifying and using hyperbole, but I believe that exaggerated analogy conveys the disconnect between post-humans (of which I consider myself one) and humans. Post-humans will provide the transitional leap between modern humans and the species that shall be derived from modern humans. And when I say a new species, I truly mean a species in the sense that no retrograde breeding would be possible.

A dissent: I believe your expressed views of outbreeding and inbreeding are too simplified. But without the ability to legally apply eugenic principles over hundreds of years, we can never truly be sure how much outbreeding and inbreeding the human population can withstand or benefit from.

I would like to point you to an article that describes how two species of butterfly were interbred producing reproductively viable offspring, something that was thought next to impossible in the animal kingdom. What we like to think of as species and subspecies today are probably very sloppy, inaccurate delineations that point to our astounding lack of insight into how nature pursues the objectives of maintaining, restraining, and promoting inbreeding and outbreeding. There is a middle road to this dichotomy that should be thought of as selective breeding, which is pointed to in the butterfly article, and which involves trying to return to an original population if one deviates, and the impulse to preserve population isolation.

Isolation and inbreeding create populations that differ from their common ancestor. If an isolated population survives, it reaches a point in which selective breeding preserves the characteristics isolated, but if the population is large enough (and should natural selection be permitted to carry off the enfeebled inbred) the population can thrive. Given enough time, isolated populations will become new species, and breeding into ancestrally related populations will fail to produce reproductively viable offspring, and eventually will cease to produce offspring at all (once the number of chromosomes becomes different you can bet no further breeding will occur, hah!). Thus inbreeding is not “bad” either biologically or morally under natural conditions that prevent direct familial inbreeding (conditions like familial disaffinity) and that weed out those offspring that have expressed biologically undesirable recessive traits.

Outbreeding is thought of as a magical panacea that counters inbreeding but this is preposterous. It can mask a recessive trait, but then only selective breeding to achieve expression of the dominant trait can eliminate the presence of the recessive trait. In other words, let’s say that blind rabbits have two (bb) genes for blindness, and yet they can outbreed with sighted rabbits (BB). Their offspring will be carriers (Bb) of the blind trait. They must continue to breed into the (BB) population for generations to progressively eliminate the recessive blind trait. And should the hybrids interbreed with one another they have equal chances of producing blind offspring and sighted offspring. In other words, outbreeding doesn’t cure the negative effects of inbreeding, death does! And it is still possible among animals that an inbred population of sufficient size can thrive, as we see with almost all purebred domestic animals.

And speaking of outbreeding, it also runs the danger of diluting a desirable trait. IF blacks are mentally inferior, and IF whites are mentally superior, and IF these traits are inherited, then mixing of these two subspecies (for let’s not kid ourselves, races are the same thing as subspecies, check the dictionary) will produce diluted offspring lacking the adaptive advantages of both parents. Taking just pigmentation as a guide, the mulatto will not survive as well in sunny tropical climates or cloudy northern climates as their respective parents would, plain and simple.

The throwback Kurds we discussed are the result of familial inbreeding and resistance to letting nature take its proper course and wipe out such throwbacks. And keep in mind that animal populations cull their own as part of nature taking its proper course. Animals abandon defectives, or in some cases eat them to recycle the wasted materials. But I would not go so far as to recommend Swiftian child consumption, abortion and infanticide of undesirables if far enough. Still, I argue that these Kurds are not expressing traits from their ancestry anymore than the dog-faced boy is giving a glimpse of our ancestry – that was the point of the post I made regarding that story.

But let no one else’s reason sway you if you can reason your own course. Full speed ahead, damn the torpedoes. Fortune favors the bold. This response itself is an example of information overload, but it is up to us to decide which information we want to receive and which we want to reject. I hope that this response is worthy of your receipt and I would be thrilled to correspond with you or like minded individuals who can contribute to our consideration of these topics.

But above all I want to make this clear: By my reckoning, the White Race is not chosen or divine. Anything that makes it worth saving or promoting is determined by its admirers and is not preordained to be found irrefutably justified. Also, the future species to be derived from humans, which we who are post-human will usher in, will look with disdain upon their ancestors, as we would look at a chimp urinating into its own mouth. I reassert: Death to Humans! And add: Hail the Post-Human!

Saturday, August 12, 2006

CDN Episode 8 Was Not Aired

Due to technical problems, no shows aired Friday on the Turner Radio Network. I am going to reedit CDN Episode 8 and it should be aired next Friday.
Are We Not Men? We are DEVO!

A Kurdish family in Turkey has sparked debate over the origins of their peculiar mode of transportation. The siblings in this family walk on all fours. They walk on their feet and the palms of their hands. The two predominant explanations for this behavior:
1) A genetic variation has caused the people to revert to an evolutionary stage of pre-humans, and that the way they walk could have been the way human ancestors walked.
2) The people have brain damage and can’t walk upright.

A few more facts might help you decide which is more likely:
1) They do not walk on their knuckles like apes; the reverse-evolutionists claim this may have allowed our ancestors to free their delicate fingers for manual tasks. Apparently the siblings can crochet and embroider.
2) They are all retarded. One of the five siblings can walk upright with difficulty and is apparently less retarded, so goes to the local village to interact with humans.
3) Their parents are very closely related.

My conclusion: This is the sort of nonsense that will end up, in the long run, embarrassing evolutionists who embrace the throwback conclusion. These hand walking people are inbred, retard sub-humans, not evolutionary throwbacks. The idea that one gene (apparently damaged in this case) or a magical combination of genes (that were all miraculously damaged in this case) is responsible for completing the transition to upright walking is ludicrous. These people are diseased. This is as preposterous as looking at midgets or mongoloids and saying, “Oh, that’s what are ancestors used to be like!”

This is a case of people projecting their own fantasies on the diseased behavior/condition - “Kinda looks like an ape, don’t it? They are walking like are ancestors did millions of years ago! Proof? I don’t need no stinking proof.” I was watching a show about circus freaks a week or two ago and they had a dog-faced boy, the werewolf type with hair all over his face. The voice-over said, something like “Maybe this is the way humans looked in the past.” Hello – idiot! Even chimps don’t have hair on their faces! The guy is suffering from a disease! I suppose flipper babies caused by thalidomide are throwbacks now to our fish ancestry? Give me a fucking break.

I just love the last line of this article on the 'throwback' family:
“Producer on the documentary Jemima Harrison said the programme's producers were moved by the family's "tremendous warmth and humanity.”

Well thank you Aunt Jemima Harrison for your opinion, but if that is what passes for human these days, I’m not just racist, I am anti-human! And I am damn proud of the fact.

Friday, August 11, 2006

CDN Episode 8 Airs Tonight (?)

There was no broadcast last night from the Turner Radio Network, and Mr. Turner's site was not updated yesterday. Assuming that Mr. Turner is willing and able today, CDN Episode 8 will air tonight at 10:00 p.m. on the Turner Radio Network. The first half of tonight's episode will be CDN stories, and the second half will be a more serious topic I would like to discuss. After tonight's episode, there are only two more episodes of CDN before the free time offer expires and I have to go back to school. So, I am going to try and get in a couple of serious topics before the summer ends as well as some new (relatively) funny stuff.

Tonight's stories include: Woody the Woodpecker Hunter, Good Night Melanie Martinez - Wherever You Are, and Oh Dear God - My Fucking Igloo!

Thursday, August 10, 2006

What the Media has Chosen to Frighten You with Today: Fat Babies

Oh God, time to panic again. Today, inevitably, the news will be full with dire warnings that America’s infants are fatter than ever. The media will take license with this story and show morbidly obese, overfed children worthy of a Maury Povich expos√© and try to pass them off as typical of the trend. You will hear the conflicting message: this doesn’t mean that babies need to be put on a diet, but you do need to watch what they eat. Watch what they eat? Do you mean keep them from eating certain high calorie foods in favor of lower calorie foods? That’s a diet you fucking retards!

The article that warns us the obesity epidemic has struck infants is in the Journal Obesity, and must be purchased 30$US, which will make sure that no one bothers to actually read the source of the story and check the method for the study, the citations, and the possibility of contrary interpretations. Instead, panic will grip millions of mothers who will now confuse baby fat with disease and start starving their infants.

I am an incredibly fat man. I know what it takes to be fat, and I know firsthand the fear of the common men and women who are scared to death of winding up like me. But I have also encountered hundreds of people who believe they are fat because they can pinch an inch, or the skin under their arms wiggles when they shake it, or that because they do not conform to the contour of a certain pair of jeans. This is hysterical fear and nonsense. Those of us who are very overweight should be made aware of the danger, and should take measures to prevent health problems related to our heft. But you “normals” who abuse your bodies daily over a 5 or 10 pound discrepancy between a BMI chart and your bathroom scale need serious mental help.

Truly overweight people can lose or gain ten pounds based on water retention or loss alone. You “normals” have to starve yourself for weeks to shed those ten pounds, and you have no idea if the loss came strictly from fat. You are being whipped up into a frenzy of self-loathing to keep you binging and purging the rest of your lives. By some estimates the diet and exercise industry generates tens of billions of dollars a year. For those of you who are on the diet treadmill, how many of you engage in physical activity for its own sake? Or is it a drudgery that is used to control your weight? I know you are afraid of being fat. Fat = ugly. Ugly = lonely. Lonely=loser. But before you start starving your babies based on report you have never even read, consider if you might be projecting your fears onto your children.

Here are the facts according to the report:
In 1980, 3.4 percent of babies were in the 95th percentile for body weight. In 2001, 5.9 percent of babies were in the 95th percentile for body weight. 5.9/3.4 = 1.73, or what has been reported as a 73% increase in the number of obese children. Out of every 1,000,000 babies 59,000 will be in the 95th percentile now, instead of 34,000. Let us say that the average American baby within two weeks of birth weighed 10 pounds, and a standard deviation for this group is 1 pound, just for the sake of argument, than what this study means is that in 1980 3.4% of babies weighed 12 pounds or greater at that point, and in 2001 5.9% of babies weighed 12 pounds or greater at the point. Do you think this warrants scaring millions of people with figures like: 73% more babies are obese! Doctors all over this country will probably now be inundated with mothers wanting to know what to do with their obese infants that aren’t really obese.

The reason for the increase is not given, but theories include the increased number of fat mothers and increased rates of gestational diabetes, but no correlating evidence was discussed. Now, here is the dirty little secret no one is willing to tell you, but that I have reported in other articles and radio stories: the reason there are more obese children in America over the past 20 years is because there are more Hispanics in America in the past twenty years. If you will remember from my previous articles, the rates of obesity are greater in Hispanics than in whites. Hispanics are generally slightly shorter than whites and even a little excess body fat can skew their BMIs and send them into the obese category. Since apparently no compensation has been made for race in the study, its findings are useless for the general public.

Please, please, please: don’t starve your babies, don’t deprive them for fear of fat. If your children (not babies!) are pudgy, consider what they do all day before what they eat. If they sit around and watch TV or play video games, encourage them to exercise, do chores, play sports, go for a walk, mow neighbor’s lawns for a few bucks, before you tell them to diet. Dieting itself is like a punishment for failure to be normal, or to conform to an ideal. The more active people are the more muscle they develop, more activity and more muscles means more calories burned, more calories burned means either losing weight or being able to eat more to maintain weight. Thus, the SOLUTION to weight IS NOT DIET, IT IS EXERCISE. Nutrition is important for all around good health, but does not have anywhere near the bearing on weight that CALORIES IN AND OUT do. An eight ounce glass of soda and an eight ounce glass of orange juice have the same number of calories. An active kid who drinks soda may not get the vitamins s/he needs but will burn the calories by exercise. An inactive kid who drinks orange juice may still get fat by not burning the calories, but will get plenty of vitamins. That is the way weight gain works.

What is so dangerous about this study is that infants can’t get exercise! By tenuously linking infantile obesity to later trends in obesity in childhood, the doctors are sending the unavoidable message that diet is the only solution to obesity, since infants cannot exercise away extra pounds. Watch their intake? That is the same as restrict their intake! And since race is taboo and was not brought into the equation, the most likely explanation for the study’s findings goes ignored. I know that some women will say: I am not starving my baby, I am just watching what s/he eats. But if you deprive your child of food so that it loses weight you are starving your infant! Babies do not need to diet; no credible doctor would suggest that.

Now, if you managed to get through all that, you deserve an ice cream cone. Take a walk around the block while you eat it and you won’t gain a pound.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

After Night of Disappointments, Democratic Losers Confirm Stereotypes: Scheming Jew and Uppity Nigger

Ah…how richly satisfying. Two democratic wing nuts were bitch slapped in their state’s primary runoffs last night.

Joe Lieberman, the kike nobody liked from the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns, failed to secure his party’s support to run as U.S. senator from Connecticut. But, in typical hymie-style, he will now run as an independent and try to split democratic votes between himself and democratic challenger Ned Lamont. The margin was surprisingly close, 52 to 48 in favor of Lamont, making one wonder what a neocon-loving, hawkish, uptight dickwad like Lieberman has to do to convince liberal voters he puts Israel’s interests before theirs. Maybe you should look at what Steve Grossman (former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, past president of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC) had to say before the 8 August 2006 primary:
"If you consider yourself first and foremost part of the pro-Israel community, you will stick with Joe Lieberman…I don't criticize those who can't support Joe Lieberman because he no longer represents the views of progressive Democrats. But there has not been a greater champion of Israel and the well-being of the Jewish people.”
Thick as thieves, don’t you think? You can judge the character of men by the company they keep.

In the second upset of the night, Cynthia McKinney, the Negro Congresswoman from Atlanta who hit a Capitol Hill police officer back in March 2006 and got away with it, lost her primary bid as well. Before the runoff, McKinney warned that she might lose as a result of Republican turnout, as had happened in 2002. But perhaps if she didn’t go around slugging uniformed security, she would not have garnered much organized opposition in the first place. In typical nigger fashion, McKinney wouldn’t even mention her opponent’s name in her concession speech, preferring to ramble on with leftist rhetoric. What a class act.

Monday, August 07, 2006

Nine Illegals Down, 20 Million to Go

Finally, some good has come from the tendency of SUV’s to roll over while making even modest corrections to the right or left! On Monday, 7 August 2006, a Chevy Suburban loaded with 22 illegals attempted to bypass a security checkpoint on an Arizona highway. After a brief chase, the Suburban rolled over like a Chihuahua begging for an Alpo stuffed chalupa. In all, 9 illegals were killed, making the Chevy Suburban the most patriotic vehicle in America. Anti-immigration groups have praised the Chevy Suburban for doing more to curb illegal immigration in 10 minutes, than George W. Bush has done in six years as President.
Grandma, Please Get Off the Cross

Madonna is painfully, publicly transforming from a naughty Catholic bad girl, to a leftist crazy Jewish grandma from hell.

Imagine Passover at Madonna’s house: Kabbalah readings set to dance mixes, plays in which she dresses up as Moses and threatens a cardboard cutout of George Bush that she will plague Texas with frogs unless he ends the Iraq war, matzahs made in the shape of illegal sex acts, the children begging mommy to step down from her mirrored cross and loosen their restraints so they can get some sleep.

Wait! You don’t have to imagine it…you can read about her show in Rome last week, it’s pretty much the same thing:

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Negroes Prone to Crime Because of Poverty, Lack of Opportunity, Not an Inherent Trait –
And Other Lies You’ve Been Told

Do you know who Claude Allen is? In February of this year, Allen resigned from his position as Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, saying he wanted to spend more time with his family. Soon after, it emerged that Allen had been accused of stealing about a thousand dollars worth of merchandise from Target stores in Montgomery County, a suburban area of Maryland, northwest of Washington D.C. People were stunned. There were rumors that Claude’s evil identical twin brother Floyd was probably the culprit. Then, in March, Allen was arrested, and the story disappeared.

On Friday 4 August 2006, Claude Allen pled guilty to a misdemeanor theft charge, agreed to repay Target for the merchandise he stole, was sentenced to pay a court fine, and to perform 40 hours worth of community service.*

And what could be Allen’s excuse for his theft?

His wife gave the world this insight: "…the 14-hour work days…less than two hours [sleep] every night for about three months…These elements, when added together, took their toll on my husband.”*

In other words, Allen got sleepy and decided to start compulsively shoplifting and returning for credit the merchandise he just shoplifted over the course of several months. The Montgomery County police stated Allen “…had been receiving refunds in an amount exceeding $5,000 during the last year.”

A few other facts to mull over:
1) Claude Allen’s Federal job earned him 160,000$ a year.*
2) Recently before his arrest, Claude Allen had purchased a home that cost nearly one million dollars.*
…Sounds like he had a lot of money…
3) Claude Allen has a law degree from Duke.
…Sounds like he had a lot of opportunity…
4) Claude Allen is a nigger.
…Oh, that explains everything! You can take a monkey out of the jungle, but not the jungle out of a monkey. That’s right, an ape in a suit is still an ape!


Saturday, August 05, 2006

Senator Droopy Dog 13 Points Behind in Primary Race!

Tuesday, August 8, Joe “Infectious-Enthusiasm” Lieberman is set to lose his party’s nomination for U.S. senator from Massachusetts. His challenger, Ned Lam----- ah who cares! As long as Lieberman gets kicked to the curb like the piece of Zionist filth he is.

Oh god, how I will relish this defeat for Senator Jewenstein! 18 years of his droning, nasal, public whining is about to come to an end! Of course, let’s not count our kosher chickens before they have been slaughtered (in the proverbial sense only of course, as in slaughtered at the polls).

It is hard to believe that Lieberman would be abandoned by Jewish liberals, who may not like Joe’s coziness with the Republicans but can’t help but vote for a fellow Hebrew. Take a look at this endorsement as proof.

It is equally hard to believe that the Neo-Cons would abandon their lap dog, who, as this article points out, is lauded by the likes of Tom Delay, Bill Kristol, and Anne Skeletor – I mean Anne Coulter.

We should probably look for behind-the-scenes shenanigans to start soon.

Pictured Below: Anne Coulter Opens Her Chanukah Gift From Uncle Joe

- Yeah, thanks Uncle Joe, another flippin' dradle.

Friday, August 04, 2006

Episode 7: Soon to Be Known as when CDN Jumped the Shark

Tonight’s CDN will be a decided change of pace. I need a break from the phony news, and news in general. I will be doing a live, non-scripted show. So the nine of you who listen to me, you have chance to call in and say your peace. I’m sorry, I exaggerated. There are only three people who listen, and I know their names:

1) Mortie Scholomotosheinsilvergoldburgenwitzhoffsteinfeldaman, attorney for the ADL, who bitterly resents being put on an assignment to monitor me
2) Bob Smith X12, Justice Department Hate-Monitoring Special Forces Clone Unit, who would bitterly resent being put on an assignment to monitor me, if he had emotions
3) Jack “duobomber” Collip, stalker who is trying to poison me by mailing gift tainted smoked sausage baskets to my home, who bitterly resents that I might be a black man

Episode 7 will probably not be funny, which means it will be exactly the same as most of my shows.

Episode 6 is now available for download, check the links on the right side of your screen.
How Stories Do Change – Military Lies and Media Complicity

Several days ago, CNN was running a story that a Mestizo-American man had lost a second son to the ongoing War on Terror. Roy Velez lost his eldest son, Freddy, in 2004, when Freddy was shot in Fallujah. Then came the news last week that Velez’s other son, Andrew, had been killed in action in Afghanistan. A tearful Roy Velez was interviewed by CNN and the video footage made available on That footage is gone. The related article is gone. Why is that? Perhaps that is because Andrew Velez actually shot himself. His death was a suicide, and CNN has decided to expunge its reporting error and move on. There was no retraction of the error, just an elimination of the evidence. Though, not a thorough elimination it seems. Here is a CNN transcript from July 27, with the mistake highlighted in bold for clarity:

PHILLIPS: Thanks Zach.
Z. REICH: Thank you very much.
PHILLIPS: One lost in Afghanistan, a second fallen in Iraq, two sons killed in action and a father's grief is unbearable. Reporter Emily Leonard of our affiliate KLBK has the story. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
EMILY LEONARD, KLBK REPORTER (voice-over): Tears of tragedy stream down the eyes of Roy Velez. Around 12:30 Tuesday afternoon, Roy received that unwanted knock on the door.
ROY VELEZ, FATHER: It's about Andrew. And he said yes sir. He said let's go inside and I said I don't want to go inside. I don't want to go inside. Tell me here. What's happened to Andrew? And it just immediately came to my mind, Andrew is dead.
LEONARD: After hearing that his son, 22-year-old army specialist Andrew Velez was shot in Afghanistan, Roy says he dropped to his knees.
VELEZ: I fell to the floor and I dragged myself. I couldn't stand in the hallway. My baby boy. My last son.
LEONARD: In November 2004, Roy's other son, 23-year-old Freddy Velez, was killed while fighting in Fallujah. Roy says he never imagined he would lose both his sons to war.
VELEZ: Felt like somebody has just raked the inside of me with some claw nails and torn everything out. There's nothing there, nothing. Nothing. It's just so hard and there's nothing on the inside of me.
LEONARD: Roy says losing both Freddy and Andrew has left him beaten and broken and the pain is unbearable.
VELEZ: I know I am not the only parent, but I have lost both my boys. I can't call out to them any more. I can't. I can't call out to Andrew and I can't call out to Fred. They can't come running to be with dad and be beside me side.
PHILLIPS: Eleven straight days of triple digit temperatures are taking a toll on California's agricultural and livestock, agriculture, rather, and livestock. Folks down on the farm fear that they will be down-and-out come harvest town.

By contrast, FoxNews hasn’t even bothered to print a correction, and still has a link to the story which states: “‘And today at 12:30 I learned my other son was killed in action,’ he said late Tuesday.” [bold added by author]

The real story, or at least the story as of now on CNN is: “A military document, confirmed by the family, says Velez shot himself July 25. Military officials and the soldier's father said Velez had been having marital problems.”

This was not a story of two brother’s killed in action while fighting the War on Terror. That is how it was spun, but it was not true. What is up with the military giving families the wrong details about their loved ones? What is with the media immediately reporting whatever the military says as fact, when the military has a horrifying record of *lies, distortions, spin, cover-ups and so forth*? Is it intellectual laziness? Is it incompetence? Is it malicious? Did Velez lie about his son? If so, why didn't CNN report it? If anyone out there can explain it, please leave me a post.

*Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman, Haditha*

Thursday, August 03, 2006

While We Were Distracted

Phillip Distasio, an Ohio pedophile, was indicted on Wednesday on 25 counts of child rape. The boys that he targeted were autistic and otherwise mentally disabled children that he had been tutoring at a school he ran in his own apartment. Distasio asserts: “The only reason I'm charged with rape is that no one believes a child can consent to sex.” But these children could not even communicate, they could not tell anyone what they were going through. He preyed upon the most helpless people he could find.

While the entire globe focuses on Mel Gibson’s anti-Semitism, the story of Phillip Distasio slips away, remains unremarkable. What are our priorities as a civilization, as a species?

Consider this: The law should demand death for this creature. People should howl for his blood. He should be sentenced to be drawn and quartered publicly.

Now you decide: would the previous comment apply more to Mel Gibson, to Phillip Distasio, to both, or neither?
I shudder to consider what this world is coming to, what people might answer to that question, what their priorities are.

This survey says that the belief pedophilia is not immoral is growing amongst Canadians; 11% said it is not immoral, 8% said they did not know if was immoral or chose not to comment. You don't know if it is immoral? Excuse me now, I have to go slam my head into the wall for a few hours since I cannot comprehend the depths of human depravity and stupidity.
Mel, Who’s your Daddy!?!

Some excerpts from a 3 March 2004 radio interview with Hutton Gibson –

I don't know what their (the Jews) agenda is except that it's all about control. They're after one world religion and one world government. That's why they've attacked the Catholic Church so strongly, to ultimately take control over it by their doctrine and make one world religion and one world government.

They are the people with an eye for eye and tooth for a tooth. They must have revenge. You know they (the Jews) caused the Roman persecutions too. They called attention to the fact that the Christians were refusing to offer incense to the emperors when the emperors became gods. The Jews were notable for getting the wood to burn the Christians…a labor of love you could say.

They cannot admit that they were wrong. They have been at it for all of history. Is the Jew still actively anti-Christian - He is, for by being a Jew, he is anti everyone else.
There are too many survivors. It's just a gimmick to collect money. They have to go where there is money... They have so much influence in the banks for instance They all look out for one another you got to give them that. They are at the same time willing to sacrifice a few of theirs if it helps… Why all the reparations? It's an irresistible chance to make money. All those Holocaust museums put up at our expense with our tax payer dollars.

Yum! Anti-semity!

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

What Can We Learn from History?

Marlon Brando has been dead since 2004.

In 1996 Brando went on Larry King and said: "Hollywood is run by Jews; it is owned by Jews--and they should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering."

Immediately afterward he apologized at the Museum of Tolerance in L.A.

In the year 2006 one can still find an article on the ADL about the outrage over Brando's comments, but Brando's apology is nowhere to be found on the same site.

Take a lesson Gibson: they never forgive, they never forget.
The Crucifixion of Mel Gibson: Nail 2 of 3
Finally, someone has openly doubted Mel's faith as a result of Gibson's drunken belligerence.

"I don't think anyone could describe his performance the other night as particularly Christian, or particularly civilized."

To recap: Gibson has been nailed for anti-Semitic remarks, had the ADL condemn him, and had his faith doubted. Ah, closure! Now we wait for Mel in a yarmulke giving a donation to a Jewish charity.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Mel Gibson has Apologized for his anti-Semitism

Gibson’s apology:
There is no excuse, nor should there be any tolerance, for anyone who thinks or expresses any kind of anti-Semitic remark. I want to apologize specifically to everyone in the Jewish community for the vitriolic and harmful words that I said to a law enforcement officer the night I was arrested on a DUI charge.
I am a public person, and when I say something, either articulated and thought out, or blurted out in a moment of insanity, my words carry weight in the public arena. As a result, I must assume personal responsibility for my words and apologize directly to those who have been hurt and offended by those words. The tenets of what I profess to believe necessitate that I exercise charity and tolerance as a way of life. Every human being is God's child, and if I wish to honor my God I have to honor his children. But please know from my heart that I am not an anti-Semite. I am not a bigot. Hatred of any kind goes against my faith. I'm not just asking for forgiveness. I would like to take it one step further, and meet with leaders in the Jewish community, with whom I can have a one on one discussion to discern the appropriate path for healing. I have begun an ongoing program of recovery and what I am now realizing is that I cannot do it alone. I am in the process of understanding where those vicious words came from during that drunken display, and I am asking the Jewish community, whom I have personally offended, to help me on my journey through recovery. Again, I am reaching out to the Jewish community for its help. I know there will be many in that community who will want nothing to do with me, and that would be understandable. But I pray that that door is not forever closed. This is not about a film. Nor is it about artistic license. This is about real life and recognizing the consequences hurtful words can have. It's about existing in harmony in a world that seems to have gone mad.

Now Mel, you will truly see the character of those your daddy warned you about. You will witness the true madness of this earth. And maybe this is what you wanted all along? Are you looking to become more Christ-like? Do you want the Jews to howl for your blood, just as they did for your savior’s blood? They will never forgive, they will never forget. No matter how much money you give, no matter how much groveling you do. And your Passion of the Christ will now forever be labeled an anti-Semitic propaganda film.

Now Mel, you said: "There is no excuse, nor should there be any tolerance, for anyone who thinks or expresses any kind of anti-Semitic remark."

But dear Mel, who decides what constitutes an anti-Semitic remark? Isn’t possible that any criticism of the Jews could be considered anti-Semitic? And the lack of tolerance you now espouse could be used to stifle criticism of Jews and Israel even when they do bad things? Ah, but you already know that, since the very accusation of anti-Semitism has brought you to your knees.

Hear the words of your God:
John 18:20 "I have spoken openly to the world," Jesus replied. "I always taught in synagogues or at the temple, where all the Jews come together. I said nothing in secret. 21 Why question me? Ask those who heard me. Surely they know what I said." 22When Jesus said this, one of the officials nearby struck him in the face. "Is this the way you answer the high priest?" he demanded. 23"If I said something wrong," Jesus replied, "testify as to what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth, why did you strike me?"*

What is the truth they fear so much? If what you send was wrong, let them testify how it was wrong. To truly emulate your savior, you would face the onslaught of Jewish hatred unrepentant for speaking the truth. But when it came time to drink from the cup you had been given, you turned it away and chose to deny Him.

Now Mel, you said: “Every human being is God's child, and if I wish to honor my God I have to honor his children.”

Hear the words of your God:

John 8:39 "Abraham is our father," they answered. "If you were Abraham's children," said Jesus, "then you would do the things Abraham did. 40As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41You are doing the things your own father does." "We are not illegitimate children," they protested. "The only Father we have is God himself."42Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. 43Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! 46Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don't you believe me? 47He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God."*

It sounds to me as if Jesus was an anti-Semite. What do you think, Mel?

*Note: All Scripture was quoted from: